ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2020
Comparative Study of
Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the LuminexJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Increase inMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Comparison of Anaerobic Culture Methods for Detecting Clostridioides difficile in Bovine Faeces.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- A Multifaced Aspect ofJournal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Overview of current detection methods and microRNA potential inWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Loop mediated isothermal amplification of Clostridioides difficile isolates in gastrointestinal patients.AMB Express · 2022Article
- Diagnostic deficiencies ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Clinical and microbial characterization of toxigenicIranian journal of microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of three methods for detecting
methodsOne hundred and fifty fecal specimens were collected and tested for
resultsOf 150 specimens, 26 carried both A and B toxin genes, and none of the samples were positive for the binary toxin gene. Toxin-producing
conclusionThe VIDAS GDH assay is useful for initial screening of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.