Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063992›Full record

ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2020

Learning how to deliver bad and challenging news: Exploring the experience of trainee sonographers - A qualitative study.

Liz Tomlin, Molly Parsons, Prashanth V Kumar, Jane Arezina, Reema Harrison, Judith Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liz TomlinBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-0324
Molly ParsonsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Prashanth V KumarSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jane ArezinaFaculty of Medicine and Health, Specialist Science Education Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Reema HarrisonSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Judith JohnsonBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies suggest there is a need to improve the delivery of bad and challenging news in obstetric ultrasound settings. However, no research has explored the experiences of trainee sonographers when learning how to deliver challenging news. Understanding this could identify gaps in current provision and inform future training interventions.

aimsTo explore the experiences of trainee sonographers when learning how to deliver challenging news.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with trainee sonographers (

resultsLearning how to deliver difficult news was a journey where trainees developed their confidence over time. Most learning occurred in clinical settings, but classroom teaching complemented this. Trainees appreciated the opportunity to observe clinical practice and to hear from patient representatives. However, quality of teaching varied between centres and trainees reported uncertainty regarding the specific language and behaviours they should use. They described building their own personal protocol for news delivery through the course of their training. DISCUSSION: An ultrasound-specific news delivery protocol which details the words and behaviours sonographers can employ could help reduce uncertainty in trainees. Trainees may also benefit from receiving structured feedback on their news delivery performance.

Indexed as

breaking bad newsfeedbackSonographytraining

Identifiers

PMID32063992
PMCPMC6987495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.