Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063989›Full record

ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2020

British Thyroid Association 2014 classification ultrasound scoring of thyroid nodules in predicting malignancy: Diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement.

Alexander Weller, Ban Sharif, Mohammad H Qarib, Dominic St Leger, Hakkini Sl De Silva, Ravi K Lingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules with indeterminate (THY3f) cytology.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander WellerDepartment of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-5236
Ban SharifDepartment of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mohammad H QaribDepartment of Radiology, Central Middlesex Hospital, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Dominic St LegerDepartment of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Hakkini Sl De SilvaDepartment of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ravi K LingamDepartment of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the inter-observer agreement amongst five observers of differing levels of expertise in applying the British Thyroid Association (2014) guidelines for ultrasound scoring of thyroid nodules (BTA-U score) in the management of thyroid cancer, and to assess the U-score diagnostic performance in predicting malignancy.

methodA total of 73 consecutive patients were included over a two-year period (July 2012 to July 2014), after referral to a tertiary head and neck oncology centre for ultrasound plus fine needle aspiration and cytology. Our five observers retrospectively and independently reviewed static ultrasound images on PACS and scored the thyroid nodules according to BTA-U classification. The observers were blinded to each other's scoring, cytology and histology results. Either the Kappa-statistic or intra-class correlation was used to assess the level of inter-observer agreement, plus agreement between the radiological and cytological diagnoses. The diagnostic performance of U-scoring for predicting final histological diagnosis was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.

resultsA Kappa-value of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.77) confirmed substantial inter-observer agreement amongst the five observers. All 17 histology confirmed malignant nodules were correctly classified as potentially malignant by all observers. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of BTA-U score in detecting and predicting malignancy were 100%, whereas the specificity and positive predictive values were 34% and 32%, respectively.

conclusionsThere is good inter-observer agreement in using the BTA-U score amongst different observers at differing levels of expertise. Adhering to BTA-U scoring can potentially achieve 100% sensitivity in selecting malignant nodules for sampling.

Indexed as

British Thyroid Associationreproducibilitythyroid nodule classificationThyroid nodulesU-grade

Identifiers

PMID32063989
PMCPMC6987506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.