ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Decitabine combined with CAG regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic Effect of Stereotactic Radiotherapy Combined with Karelizumab on Patients with Advanced NSCLC.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Frequency of complete remission after standard 3+7 induction therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with CAG ((cytarabine + aclacinomycin + granulocyte colony stimulating factor)) regimen and CAG regimen alone in the treatment of elderly acute myeloid leukemia.
methods96 elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia who were admitted to our hospital from July 2015 to July 2017 were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 48 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with CAG regimen, while the patients in the observation group were treated with decitabine on the basis of the control group. The clinical curative effect, changes of immune indicators, occurrence of adverse reactions and survival rate at different time after treatment were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the indicators of cellular immunity in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the indicators of cellular immunity in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). The 9-month survival rate and 1-year survival rate in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionThe combination of decitabine and CAG regimen is effective in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The therapy can fully inhibit cellular immune function and improve long-term survival rate, and its safety has a small difference with that of CAG regimen alone. It is worth clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.