Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063900›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Isolation and Selection of Duck Primary Cells as Pathogenic and Innate Immunologic Cell Models for Duck Plague Virus.

Bin Tian, Dongjie Cai, Tianqiong He, Liyao Deng, Liping Wu, Mingshu Wang, Renyong Jia, Dekang Zhu, Mafeng Liu, Qiao Yang and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional characterization ofThe veterinary quarterly · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bin TianInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Dongjie CaiKey Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Tianqiong HeInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Liyao DengInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Liping WuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Mingshu WangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Renyong JiaInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Dekang ZhuResearch Center of Avian Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Mafeng LiuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Qiao YangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Ying WuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xinxin ZhaoInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Shun ChenInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Shaqiu ZhangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Juan HuangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xumin OuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Sai MaoInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yanling YuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Ling ZhangInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yunya LiuInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Anchun ChengInstitute of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duck plague virus (DPV) is a representative pathogen transmitted among aquatic animals that causes gross lesions and immune inhibition in geese and ducks. The mechanism of organ tropism and innate immune evasion of DPV has not been completely deciphered due to a lack of cell models to study the innate immune manipulation and pathogenicity of aquatic viruses. In the present study, we isolated five types of duck primary cells [duck embryo fibroblasts (DEFs), neurons, astrocytes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and monocytes/macrophages] to identify appropriate cell models for DPV, using tropism infection and innate immunologic assays. Cells responded differently to stimulation with DNA viruses or RNA virus analogs. DPV infection exhibited broad tropism, as the recombinant virulent strain (CHv-GFP) infected DEFs, neurons, astrocytes, and monocytes/macrophages, but not the PBMCs, as the expression of EGFP was negligible. The basal levels of innate immunity molecules were highest in monocytes/macrophages and lower in DEFs and astrocytes. Conversely, the titer and genomic copy number of the attenuated virus strain was higher in DEFs and astrocytes than in neurons and monocytes/macrophages. The titer and genomic copy number of the attenuated virus strain were higher compared with the virulent strain in DEFs, neurons, and astrocytes. The innate immune response was not significantly induced by either DPV strain in DEFs, neurons, or astrocytes. The virulent strain persistently infected monocytes/macrophages, but the attenuated strain did so abortively, and this was accompanied by the phenomenon of innate immune inhibition and activation by the virulent and attenuated strains, respectively. Blockage of IFNAR signaling promoted replication of the attenuated strain. Pre-activation of IFNAR signaling inhibited infection by the virulent strain. The selection assay results indicated that induction of innate immunity plays an essential role in controlling DPV infection, and monocytes/macrophages are an important cell model for further investigations. Our study provided practical methods for isolating and culturing duck primary cells, and our results will facilitate further investigations of organ tropism, innate immune responses, latent infection, and the effectiveness of antiviral drugs for treating DPV and potentially other aerial bird pathogens.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAstrocytesCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedDucksImmunity, InnateMacrophagesMardivirusMarek DiseaseMonocytesNeuronsabortive infectionduck plague virusduck primary cell isolationIFNAR signalinginnate immune induction

Identifiers

PMID32063900
PMCPMC6999086
OpenAlexW3003479147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.