ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2019
Comparison Of Methods To Estimate Disease-Related Cost And Healthcare Resource Utilization For Autoimmune Diseases In Administrative Claims Databases.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microgravity activates monocyte ERK1/2 signaling and modulates the response to lipopolysaccharide.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Health Care Utilization and Costs in Systemic Therapies for Metastatic Melanoma from 2016 to 2020.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Effectiveness, safety, and healthcare costs associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin among venous thromboembolism patients with obesity: a real-world study in the United States.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstablishing disease-related cost and/or healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) is an important aspect of health outcomes research, particularly when considering the cost offset of novel treatments. However, few studies have compared methodologies used to assess disease-related cost/HCRU.
methodsData from the United States IBM RESULTS AND
conclusionOverall, 24,373 patients with RA and 9665 with UC were included. Average total cost during 2015 was $US28,750 per patient with RA and $US20,480 per patient with UC. Disease-related cost and HCRU for RA calculated using Method 4 were most closely approximated by Methods 1 and 2 (3.5×), with Method 2 (3.5×) the closest approximation. However, in certain research scenarios, the simplest method compared in this analysis, Method 1, may provide an adequate approximation of disease-related cost and HCRU. Although Method 4 was not executed in the UC analysis because of its labor-intensive nature, similar patterns of disease-related cost and HCRU were observed for Methods 1-3 in patients with UC and RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.