ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2019
Clinical And Economic Burden Of Eosinophilic COPD In A Large Retrospective US Cohort.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The predictive value of combined detection of serum IL-33, TSLP and eosinophils in the treatment effect and exacerbation risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Exacerbations and Healthcare Burden of COPD with Type 2 Inflammation: US Claims Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Butyrate Regulating Inflammatory Responses in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease via the Gut-Lung Axis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Prescriber Uptake and Use of Novel Lipid-Lowering Therapies.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Impact of payer rejections and out-of-pocket costs on patient access to bempedoic acid therapy.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Economic Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Long-term oxygen treatment need is less frequent in eosinophilic COPD patients.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Burden of Disease Among Exacerbating Patients with COPD Treated with Triple Therapy in Spain.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021Observational
- Clinical and Economic Consequences of Inhaled Corticosteroid Doses and Particle Size in Triple Inhalation Therapy for COPD: Real-Life Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We sought to describe clinical and economic outcomes for COPD patients by blood eosinophil (EOS) count. Methods: This retrospective cohort study of COPD patients used data from the Practice Fusion electronic medical records (EMR) database linked to Symphony Health Solutions transactional pharmacy, medical, outpatient, and inpatient claims data to evaluate COPD-related and all-cause health care resource utilization and cost in the 12-month period following the date of each patient's greatest recorded blood eosinophil count during the 27-month period from January 2014 to March 2016. A post-index moderate exacerbation was defined as an outpatient or emergency care visit for COPD and a prescription for oral corticosteroid and/or antibiotics within 10 days of the visit. Severe exacerbation was defined as an inpatient hospitalization with COPD as primary diagnosis. Results: Of 48,090 EMR patients, 39,939 (83.1%) had a charge in the claims data both pre- and post-index (mean age 67.2 years, 58.3% female), 17,397 (43.6%) had EOS ≥220 cells/µL. Moderate and severe exacerbations were more frequent for patients with EOS≥220 cells/µL compared with those with EOS <220 cells/µL (moderate: 6.8% vs 6.1%, p<0.05; severe: 3.1% vs 2.5%, p<0.001). After adjustment for baseline clinical characteristics, each 100-unit increase in EOS count was associated with a significant 2.24% increase in total all-cause costs and 4.54% increase in total COPD-related costs (p<0.001 for both). COPD-related costs were significantly greater for patients with an EOS count of ≥220 cells/µL compared with those with EOS <220 cells/µL (p<0.001). These costs appear to have been driven by a greater percentage of patients in the ≥220 cells/µL cohort with COPD-related resource use including hospitalization, office visits, ambulatory procedures and pharmacy prescriptions. Conclusion: COPD patients with EOS counts ≥220 cells/µL were more likely to have had moderate or severe exacerbations and greater cost of care than those with EOS <220 cells/µL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.