Observational studyClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2020
Treatment Patterns and Blood Counts in Patients With Polycythemia Vera Treated With Hydroxyurea in the United States: An Analysis From the REVEAL Study.
Observational study in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia: A Nationwide Population-Based Study on Treatment Patterns, Vascular Complications and Survival.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Regression of Post-Essential Thrombocythaemia Myelofibrosis with Intermittent Hydroxyurea Therapy: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Prevalence, incidence, and thromboembolic events in polycythemia vera: a study based on longitudinal German health claims data.Annals of hematology · 2025Observational
- Treatment with ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with hydroxyurea resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera in South Korea: one-year results from a phase 2 study.Blood research · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft for the treatment of polycythemia vera.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Article
- Real-world treatments and thrombotic events in polycythemia vera patients in the USA.Annals of hematology · 2023Observational
- Management of polycythemia vera: A survey of treatment patterns in Italy.European journal of haematology · 2023Article
- Advances in Risk Stratification and Treatment of Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2022Review
- Recent advances in prognostication and treatment of polycythemia vera.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
- Is there a gender effect in polycythemia vera?Annals of hematology · 2021Review
- Updates in the management of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolycythemia vera (PV) is associated with increased blood cell counts, risk of thrombosis, and symptoms including fatigue and pruritus. National guidelines support the use of hydroxyurea (HU) in high-risk patients or those with some other clinical indication for cytoreduction. PATIENTS AND
methodsREVEAL is a prospective, observational study designed to collect data pertaining to demographics, disease burden, clinical management, patient-reported outcomes, and health care resource utilization of patients with PV in the United States. In this analysis, HU treatment patterns and outcomes were assessed from 6 months prior to enrollment to the time of discontinuation, death, or data cutoff.
resultsOf the 1381 patients who received HU for ≥ 3 months, the median HU exposure was 23.6 months (range, 3.1-38.5 months). The most common maximum daily HU doses were 1000 mg (30.6%) and 500 mg (30.1%); only 6.4% received ≥ 2 g/d HU. Approximately one-third (32.3%) of patients had dose adjustments, 23.8% had dose interruptions, and 257 (18.6%) discontinued HU. The most common reasons for HU discontinuations and interruptions were adverse events/intolerance (37.1% and 54.5%, respectively) and lack of efficacy (35.5% and 22.1%, respectively). Of those who received HU for ≥ 3 months, 57.1% had hematocrit values > 45% on ≥ 1 occasion, 33.1% continued to receive phlebotomies, and 27.4% had uncontrolled myeloproliferation.
conclusionThe results of this analysis emphasize the need for active management of patients with PV with appropriate HU dose titration to maintain blood count control while monitoring for signs and symptoms of HU intolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.