Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063393›Full record

Observational studyUltrasound in medicine & biology2020

Diagnostic Value of Bedside Lung Ultrasonography in Pneumonia.

Canbahar Sezgin, Muge Gunalp, Sinan Genc, Nurdan Acar, Evren Ustuner, Ahmet Burak Oguz, Ayca Koca Tanriverdi, Arda Demirkan, Onur Polat

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Lung Ultrasound for Treatment of Patients With COVID-19: Please Report Your Settings and Mechanical Index.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. The Role of Lung Ultrasound in the Assessment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Canbahar SezginHitit University, Erol Olcok Education and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Corum, Turkey.
Muge GunalpAnkara University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Sinan GencAnkara University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Nurdan AcarEskisehir Osmangazi University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Evren UstunerAnkara University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet Burak OguzAnkara University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: aboguz@ankara.edu.tr.
Ayca Koca TanriverdiAnkara University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Arda DemirkanAnkara University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Onur PolatAnkara University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TREskişehir Osmangazi University · TRHitit Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bedside lung ultrasonography (LUS) is a reliable method for the diagnosis of pneumonia. No common consensus exists in the literature regarding the effectiveness of LUS findings, except consolidation, for the diagnosis of pneumonia. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of LUS for the diagnosis of pneumonia, and the secondary objective was to investigate the use of LUS findings, except consolidation, for the diagnosis of pneumonia. A total of 127 patients with clinically suspected pneumonia were evaluated in the study. The sensitivity and specificity of LUS were 98.0% and 95.8%, respectively. In the cases where consolidation was not determined in LUS but B-3 line positivity or a diffuse interstitial pattern was present, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.3% and 88.2%, respectively. When consolidation was not observed in LUS, the presence of B-3 line positivity or diffuse interstitial pattern could be used for the diagnosis of pneumonia.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity-Acquired InfectionsEarly DiagnosisEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPneumoniaProspective StudiesRadiographySensitivity and SpecificityEmergencyLung ultrasonographyPneumonia

Identifiers

PMID32063393
OpenAlexW3005741462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.