Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063122›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Cardiovascular Health Among Pregnant Women, Aged 20 to 44 Years, in the United States.

Amanda M Perak, Hongyan Ning, Sadiya S Khan, Linda V Van Horn, William A Grobman, Donald M Lloyd-Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prenatal loss of control eating and cardiovascular health: Extending prior findings.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations between prenatal loss of control eating and cardiovascular health during pregnancy.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda M PerakDepartment of Preventive Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.
Hongyan NingDepartment of Preventive Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.
Sadiya S KhanDepartment of Preventive Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.
Linda V Van HornDepartment of Preventive Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.
William A GrobmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.
Donald M Lloyd-JonesDepartment of Preventive Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)KL2TR001424 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHARMA, LEENA · 2015 to 2023
$8.1M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN CVD EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTIONT32HL069771 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Mercedes Renee Carnethon · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
Response of the Gut Microbiome and Circulating Metabolome to Diet Intervention in Young Children: Ancillary Study to the Keeping Ideal Cardiovascular Health Family Intervention Trial (KIDFIT)K23HL145101 · NHLBI · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI MARMA, AMANDA K · 2019 to 2023
$948k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001424NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL145101NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pregnancy is a cardiometabolic stressor and thus a critical period to address women's lifetime cardiovascular health (CVH). However, CVH among US pregnant women has not been characterized. Methods and Results We analyzed cross-sectional data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999 to 2014 for 1117 pregnant and 8200 nonpregnant women, aged 20 to 44 years. We assessed 7 CVH metrics using American Heart Association definitions modified for pregnancy; categorized metrics as ideal, intermediate, or poor; assigned these categories 2, 1, or 0 points, respectively; and summed across the 7 metrics for a total score of 0 to 14 points. Total scores 12 to 14 indicated high CVH; 8 to 11, moderate CVH; and 0 to 7, low CVH. We applied survey weights to generate US population-level estimates of CVH levels and compared pregnant and nonpregnant women using demographic-adjusted polytomous logistic and linear regression. Among pregnant women, the prevalences (95% CIs) of ideal levels of CVH metrics were 0.1% (0%-0.3%) for diet, 27.3% (22.2%-32.3%) for physical activity, 38.9% (33.7%-44.0%) for total cholesterol, 51.1% (46.0%-56.2%) for body mass index, 77.7% (73.3%-82.2%) for smoking, 90.4% (87.5%-93.3%) for blood pressure, and 91.6% (88.3%-94.9%) for fasting glucose. The mean total CVH score was 8.3 (95% CI, 8.0-8.7) of 14, with high CVH in 4.6% (95% CI, 0.5%-8.8%), moderate CVH in 60.6% (95% CI, 52.3%-68.9%), and low CVH in 34.8% (95% CI, 26.4%-43.2%). CVH levels were significantly lower among pregnant versus nonpregnant women; for example, 13.0% (95% CI, 11.0%-15.0%) of nonpregnant women had high CVH (adjusted, comparison

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsNutrition SurveysPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPrevalenceUnited StatesYoung AdultBlood Glucosecardiovascular healthLife's Simple 7pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID32063122
PMCPMC7070227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.