Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063093›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology2020

Dissociations within neglect-related reading impairments: Egocentric and allocentric neglect dyslexia.

Margaret Jane Moore, Nir Shalev, Celine R Gillebert, Nele Demeyere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Margaret Jane MooreDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nir ShalevDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Celine R GillebertDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6686-7262
Nele DemeyereDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0416-5147

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101253/A/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistently lateralized reading errors are commonly understood as side-effects of visuospatial neglect impairment. There is however a qualitative difference between systematically omitting full words presented on one side of passages (egocentric neglect dyslexia) and lateralized errors when reading single words (allocentric neglect dyslexia). This study aims to investigate the relationship between egocentric and allocentric neglect dyslexia and visuospatial neglect.1209 stroke survivors completed standardized reading and cancellation tests. Stringent criteria identified unambiguous cases of allocentric neglect dyslexia (N = 17) and egocentric neglect dyslexia (N = 35). These conditions were found to be doubly dissociated with all cases of egocentric and allocentric neglect dyslexia occurring independently. Allocentric neglect dyslexia was dissociated from both egocentric and allocentric visuospatial neglect. Additionally, two cases of allocentric neglect dyslexia which co-occurred with oppositely lateralized domain-general visuospatial neglect were identified. Conversely, all cases of egocentric neglect dyslexia were found in the presence of domain-general visuospatial neglect. These findings suggest that allocentric neglect dyslexia cannot be fully understood as a consequence of visuospatial neglect. In contrast, we found no evidence for a dissociation between egocentric neglect dyslexia and visuospatial neglect. These findings highlight the need for new, neglect dyslexia specific rehabilitation strategies to be designed and tested.

Indexed as

ReadingAgedAged, 80 and overDyslexiaFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPerceptual DisordersSpace PerceptionStrokeSurvivorsacquired dyslexiaNeglect dyslexiasentence-level neglectvisuospatial neglect

Identifiers

PMID32063093
PMCPMC7175469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.