Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063059›Full record

Trial reportHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2020

Randomized Dose-Response Study of the New Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Aprocitentan in Hypertension.

Pierre Verweij, Parisa Danaietash, Bruno Flamion, Joël Ménard, Marc Bellet

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review Article: New Drug Strategies for Treating Resistant Hypertension-the Importance of a Mechanistic, Personalized Approach.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Current Knowledge About Aprocitentan in Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Endothelin antagonists for hypertension: has their time finally arrived?Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025
    Review
  14. New pharmacological agents and novel cardiovascular pharmacotherapy strategies in 2024.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Emerging therapeutic frontiers in hypertension management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre VerweijFrom Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland (P.V., P.D., B.F., M.B.).
Parisa DanaietashFrom Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland (P.V., P.D., B.F., M.B.).
Bruno FlamionFrom Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland (P.V., P.D., B.F., M.B.).
Joël MénardClinical Investigation Centre, Inserm /Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Paris and Université Paris-Descartes, France (J.M.).
Marc BelletFrom Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland (P.V., P.D., B.F., M.B.).
Idorsia (Switzerland) · CHIdiap Research Institute · CHInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the dose-response characteristics of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin A/endothelin B receptor antagonist, in patients with essential hypertension. In a randomized, double-blind, parallel study design, eligible patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 90-109 mm Hg received aprocitentan 5, 10, 25, or 50 mg, placebo, or lisinopril 20 mg as a positive control once daily for 8 weeks. Multiple automated office BP readings were obtained with patients resting unattended (unattended automated office BP) at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 8. Ambulatory BP was monitored for 24 hours at baseline and week 8. After a single-blind placebo run-in period, 490 eligible patients were randomized to the double-blind phase, with 409 patients completing 8 weeks of therapy per protocol. Aprocitentan 10, 25, and 50 mg decreased sitting systolic/diastolic unattended automated office BP from baseline to week 8 (placebo-corrected decreases: 7.05/4.93, 9.90/6.99, and 7.58/4.95 mm Hg, respectively,

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHematocritHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPyrimidinesSerum AlbuminSulfonamidesAntihypertensive AgentsaprocitentanGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanPyrimidinesSerum AlbuminSulfonamidesUric Acidaprocitentanblood pressureendothelinessential hypertension

Identifiers

PMID32063059
PMCPMC7098434
OpenAlexW3007281333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.