Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063049›Full record

Observational studyCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2020

Sex Differences in Symptom Phenotypes Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

John E Brush, Harlan M Krumholz, Erich J Greene, Rachel P Dreyer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Reconceptualizing the ethics of diagnosis: a Foucauldian framework.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Sex differences in time to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Acute coronary syndromes.Lancet (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John E BrushSentara Healthcare and Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA (J.E.B).
Harlan M KrumholzSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (H.M.K), Yale School of Medicine.
Erich J GreeneDepartment of Biostatistics (E.J.G), Yale School of Public Health.
Rachel P DreyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine (R.P.D), Yale School of Medicine.
Eastern Virginia Medical School · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Young Women With Acute Myocardial InfarctionR01HL081153 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRUMHOLZ, HARLAN MARC · 2007 to 2012
$10.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is missed more frequently in young women than men, which may be related to the cognitive psychology of the diagnostic process. Physicians start the diagnostic process by intuitively recognizing familiar symptom phenotypes, but little is known about how symptoms combine in individuals as unique symptom phenotypes. We examined how symptoms of AMI combine as unique symptom phenotypes in individual patients to compare the distribution of symptom phenotypes in women versus men. METHODS AND

resultsThe VIRGO study (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) was a multicenter, observational cohort study of 3501 young adults hospitalized with AMI. Data were collected on presenting symptoms with standardized interviews and from medical record abstraction. The number and distribution of unique symptom phenotypes were compared between women and men. Because of the 2:1 female-to-male enrollment ratio, women and men were compared with permutation testing and repeated subsampling. There were 426 interview-symptom phenotypes in women and 280 in men. The observed difference between women and men of 146 phenotypes was significant, even allowing for the greater enrollment of women (permutation

conclusionsWomen exhibited substantially more variation in unique symptom phenotypes than men, regardless of whether the symptoms were derived from structured interviews or abstracted from the medical record. These findings may provide an explanation for the higher missed diagnosis rate in young women with AMI and may have important implications for teaching and improving clinicians' ability to recognize the diagnosis of AMI in women.

Indexed as

Biological Variation, IndividualHealth Status DisparitiesSymptom AssessmentAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient AdmissionPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRisk Assessmentdiagnosismedical recordmyocardial infarctionphenotypeyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID32063049
PMCPMC7041412
OpenAlexW3006977018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.