Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32063034›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2021

Noninvasive Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs With Wearables: Fit for Medical Use?

Malte Jacobsen, Till A Dembek, Guido Kobbe, Peter W Gaidzik, Lutz Heinemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Direct-to-Consumer Testing: Relevance for Diabetes Therapy.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malte JacobsenUniversity Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
Till A DembekDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, Germany.
Guido KobbeClinic for Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter W GaidzikInstitute for Health Care Law, University Witten/Herdecke, Germany.
Lutz HeinemannScience-Consulting in Diabetes, Neuss, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2493-1304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearables (= wearable computer) enable continuous and noninvasive monitoring of a range of vital signs. Mobile and cost-effective devices, combined with powerful data analysis tools, open new dimensions in assessing body functions ("digital biomarkers").

methodsTo answer the question whether wearables are ready for use in the medical context, a PubMed literature search and analysis for their clinical-scientific use using publications from the years 2008 to 2018 was performed.

resultsA total of 79 out of 314 search hits were publications on clinical trials with wearables, of which 16 were randomized controlled trials. Motion sensors were most frequently used to measure defined movements, movement disorders, or general physical activity. Approximately 20% of the studies used sensors to detect cardiovascular parameters. As for the sensor location, the wrist was chosen in most studies (22.8%).

conclusionWearables can be used in a precisely defined medical context, when taking into account complex influencing factors.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesBiomarkersExerciseHumansVital SignsBiomarkersclinical trialsdigital biomarkersnoninvasivevital signswearables

Identifiers

PMID32063034
PMCPMC7783016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.