Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32062801›Full record

ArticlePituitary2020

A novel diagnostic method for pituitary adenoma based on magnetic resonance imaging using a convolutional neural network.

Yu Qian, Yue Qiu, Cheng-Cheng Li, Zhong-Yuan Wang, Bo-Wen Cao, Hong-Xin Huang, Yi-Hong Ni, Lu-Lu Chen, Jin-Yu Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Radiomics of pituitary adenoma using computer vision: a review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Applications and Integration of Radiomics for Skull Base Oncology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yu QianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jiangsu University Affiliated People's Hospital, Zhenjiang, 212002, Jiangsu, China.
Yue QiuThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Cheng-Cheng LiCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Zhong-Yuan WangThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Bo-Wen CaoThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Hong-Xin HuangThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Yi-Hong NiThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China.
Lu-Lu ChenDepartment of Anatomy, Histology, and Embryology, Nanjing Medical University Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211166, China. chenlulu@njmu.edu.cn.
Jin-Yu SunThe First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu, China. sunjinyu@njmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was designed to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) to diagnose patients with pituitary tumors.

methodsWe included adult patients clinically diagnosed with pituitary adenoma (pituitary adenoma group), or adult individuals without pituitary adenoma (control group). After pre-processing, all the MRI data were randomly divided into training or testing datasets in a ratio of 8:2 to create or evaluate the CNN model. Multiple CNNs with the same structure were applied for different types of MR images respectively, and a comprehensive diagnosis was performed based on the classification results of different types of MR images using an equal-weighted majority voting strategy. Finally, we assessed the diagnostic performance of the CAD system by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and F1 score.

resultsWe enrolled 149 participants with 796 MR images and adopted the data augmentation technology to create 7960 new images. The proposed CAD method showed remarkable diagnostic performance with an overall accuracy of 91.02%, sensitivity of 92.27%, specificity of 75.70%, positive predictive value of 93.45%, and F1-score of 92.67% in separate MRI type. In the comprehensive diagnosis, the CAD achieved better performance with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 96.97%, 94.44%, and 100%, respectively.

conclusionThe CAD system could accurately diagnose patients with pituitary tumors based on MR images. Further, we will improve this CAD system by augmenting the amount of dataset and evaluate its performance by external dataset.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerPituitary NeoplasmsArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDiagnoseMagnetic resonance imagingPituitary adenoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.