Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32062788›Full record

SynthesisJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2020

Outcome of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmad Halawa, Rahul Jain, Mohit K Turagam, Fred M Kusumoto, Henok G Woldu, Sandeep Gautam

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Redefining Cardiac Sarcoidosis with Advanced Imaging and Therapeutic Strategies.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  3. Device Therapy in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Current Review, Challenges, and Future Prospects.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad HalawaClinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. ahalawa@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5455-2378
Rahul JainIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mohit K TuragamHelmsley Center for Cardiac Electrophysiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA.
Fred M KusumotoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Henok G WolduBiostatistics Research Design Unit, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA.
Sandeep GautamDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USIndiana University School of MedicineMayo Clinic Hospital · USMount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiac sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory disorder characterized by ventricular arrhythmias. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is used to prevent sudden cardiac death.

methodsWe performed literature search for studies that addressed the outcome and complications of ICD in Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS). Multiple search sites were reviewed from January 1, 2000 until December 1, 2018. We then performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model. Two investigators independently extracted the data and assessed studies' quality.

resultsTen studies with 585 patients qualified for the analysis. In the pooled analysis, 57% were male with mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 38.4%. Appropriate and inappropriate ICD treatments (AT and IAT) were reported in 39% and 15% of patients respectively over mean follow-up period of 25 months and mortality rate of 8%. A sub-analysis of four studies indicated that patients with appropriate therapy did not differ from the rest of CS population in LVEF% (mean difference (MD) = - 7.37%, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 16.89 to 2.15, p = 0.12), age (MD = - 3.87 years, 95% CI - 10.19 to 2.46, p = 0.23), primary prevention (range difference (RD) = - 0.11, 95% CI - 0.31 to 0.10, p = 0.31) or secondary prevention indication (RD = 0.09, 95% CI - 0.12 to 0.3, p = 0.37). High degree AV block was more common in patients with AT (RD = 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.14 p = 0.05).

conclusionsICD placement in CS is associated with high incidence of both appropriate and inappropriate therapy. High degree AV block appears to be predictive of appropriate ICD therapy.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableSarcoidosisDeath, Sudden, CardiacHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRisk FactorsStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftICD treatmentImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorMortalitySarcoidosis

Identifiers

PMID32062788
OpenAlexW3006590241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.