Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32062786›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Role of preoperative gut microbiota on colorectal anastomotic leakage: preliminary results.

Silvia Palmisano, Giuseppina Campisciano, Cristiana Iacuzzo, Laura Bonadio, Annalisa Zucca, Davide Cosola, Manola Comar, Nicolò de Manzini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Review of Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Tumor Progression and Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  17. The Influence of the Microbiome on Anastomotic Leak.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia PalmisanoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, 34127, Trieste, Italy. spalmisano@units.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4749-4258
Giuseppina CampiscianoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS, Burlo Garofolo, Via dell' Istria 65/1, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Cristiana IacuzzoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Laura BonadioDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Annalisa ZuccaDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Davide CosolaSurgical Clinic Unit, Cattinara Hospital, ASUITS, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149, Trieste, Italy.
Manola ComarDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Nicolò de ManziniDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITOspedale di Cattinara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dysbiosis is defined as a disturbed symbiotic relationship between microbiota and the host and can cause a pro-inflammatory imbalance impairing the healing process at anastomotic level. The aim of this study is to detect, in fecal samples collected in the preoperative time, a peculiar microbiota composition that could predict the onset of colorectal anastomotic leakage. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe compared gut microbiota of healthy patients (Group A) and patients with colorectal cancer eligible for surgery (Group B). Group B was divided into patients who developed anastomotic leak (Group BL) and patients who had uneventful recovery (Group BNL). Stool samples were collected before surgery and after neoadjuvant treatment.

resultsWe analyzed stool samples from 48 patients, 27 belonging to Group A and 21 to Group B. In Group B, five patients developed anastomotic leakage (Group BL). Compared to healthy subjects, Group B showed a moderate increase of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria, a moderate reduction of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, and a statistically significant reduction of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Group BL patients showed an array of bacterial species which promoted dysbiosis, such as Acinetobacter lwoffii and Hafnia alvei. Group BNL patients showed that bacterial species like Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Barnesiella intestinihominis have a protective function.

conclusionsThe bacterial flora in subjects with colorectal cancer is statistically different compared to healthy patients. The presence of preoperative aggressive bacteria and the lack of protective strains has strengthened the hypothesis that a peculiar microbiota composition could represent a risk factor for the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakColorectal NeoplasmsDigestive System Surgical ProceduresDysbiosisFemaleGastrointestinal TractHealthy VolunteersHost Microbial InteractionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyAnastomotic leakageColorectal cancerGut microbiotaMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID32062786
OpenAlexW3005647213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.