Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32062764›Full record

SynthesisPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

Feasibility of School-Based Identification of Children and Adolescents Experiencing, or At-risk of Developing, Mental Health Difficulties: a Systematic Review.

Emma Soneson, Emma Howarth, Tamsin Ford, Ayla Humphrey, Peter B Jones, Jo Thompson Coon, Morwenna Rogers, Joanna K Anderson

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Universal Child Mental Health Screening for Parents: a Systematic Review of the Evidence.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma SonesonUniversity of Cambridge Department of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK. es703@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1666-3012
Emma HowarthNIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) East of England, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tamsin FordUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Ayla HumphreyUniversity of Cambridge Department of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Peter B JonesUniversity of Cambridge Department of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
Jo Thompson CoonNIHR ARC South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Morwenna RogersNIHR ARC South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Joanna K AndersonNIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) East of England, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Department of Health NoneMedical Research Council MC_PC_18042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under-identification of mental health difficulties (MHD) in children and young people contributes to the significant unmet need for mental health care. School-based programmes have the potential to improve identification rates. This systematic review aimed to determine the feasibility of various models of school-based identification of MHD. We conducted systematic searches in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, British Education Index, and ASSIA using terms for mental health combined with terms for school-based identification. We included studies that assessed feasibility of school-based identification of students in formal education aged 3-18 with MHD, symptomatology of MHD, or exposed to risks for MHD. Feasibility was defined in terms of (1) intervention fit, (2) cost and resource implications, (3) intervention complexity, flexibility, manualisation, and time concerns, and (4) adverse events. Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The majority focused on behavioural and socioemotional problems or suicide risk, examined universal screening models, and used cross-sectional designs. In general, school-based programmes for identifying MHD aligned with schools' priorities, but their appropriateness for students varied by condition. Time, resource, and cost concerns were the most common barriers to feasibility across models and conditions. The evidence base regarding feasibility is limited, and study heterogeneity prohibits definitive conclusions about the feasibility of different identification models. Education, health, and government agencies must determine how to allocate available resources to make the widespread adoption of school-based identification programmes more feasible. Furthermore, the definition and measurement of feasibility must be standardised to promote any future comparison between models and conditions.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMental HealthSchoolsAdolescentChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleStudentsFeasibilityIdentificationMental healthSchoolsScreening

Identifiers

PMID32062764
PMCPMC7305254
OpenAlexW2999660267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.