Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32062686›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2020

Microbial Contamination of Medical Staff Clothing During Patient Care Activities: Performance of Decontamination of Domestic Versus Industrial Laundering Procedures.

Angela Chiereghin, Silvia Felici, Dino Gibertoni, Claudio Foschi, Gabriele Turello, Giulia Piccirilli, Liliana Gabrielli, Pierangelo Clerici, Maria Paola Landini, Tiziana Lazzarotto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Textiles as fomites in the healthcare system.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angela ChiereghinDepartment of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia FeliciDepartment of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Dino GibertoniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Hygiene and Biostatistics, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio FoschiDepartment of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Gabriele TurelloDepartment of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia PiccirilliDepartment of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Liliana GabrielliDepartment of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Pierangelo ClericiMicrobiology Unit, Hospital of Legnano, ASST Ovest Milanese, Via Papa Giovanni Paolo II, 20025, Legnano, MI, Italy.
Maria Paola LandiniRizzoli Scientific Orthopedic Institute, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Tiziana LazzarottoDepartment of Specialized, Experimental, and Diagnostic Medicine, Operative Unit of Clinical Microbiology, St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. tiziana.lazzarotto@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-363X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of domestic laundering of healthcare staff clothing is still debated. This study aimed to compare the performance of decontamination of different domestic laundering with that of industrial laundering. Fourteen naturally contaminated white coats of healthcare workers (5 fabric squares from each coat) and fabric squares of artificially contaminated cotton cloth (30 fabric squares per each bacterial strain used) were included. Four domestic laundering procedures were performed; two different washing temperatures (40 °C and 90 °C) and drying (tumble dry and air dry) were used. All fabric squares were ironed. Presence of bacterial bioburden on the fabric squares after domestic and industrial laundering was investigated. None of the naturally contaminated fabric squares resulted completely decontaminated after any of the domestic washes. At 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation, bacterial growth was observed in all the laundered fabric squares. Besides environmental microorganisms, potentially pathogenic bacteria (i.e., Acinetobacter lwoffii, Micrococcus luteus, coagulase-negative staphylococci) were isolated. On the artificially contaminated fabric squares, the bioburden was reduced after the domestic laundries; nevertheless, both Gram-negative and -positive pathogenic bacteria were not completely removed. In addition, a contamination of the fabric squares by environmental Gram-negative bacteria was observed. In both the naturally and artificially contaminated fabric squares, no bacterial growth at all the time-points analyzed was observed after industrial laundering, which provided to be more effective in bacterial decontamination than domestic washes. For those areas requiring the highest level of decontamination, the use of specialized industrial laundry services should be preferred.

Indexed as

ClothingBacteriaColony Count, MicrobialDecontaminationEnvironmental MicrobiologyHealth PersonnelHumansLaunderingTextiles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.