Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32062677›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2020

Impact of postoperative instructions on physical activity following pelvic reconstructive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Divya Arunachalam, Michael H Heit

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06909058 (Postoperative Restrictions for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Procedures), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06909058 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Postoperative Restrictions for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnna FrappaoloRan2025 to 2026Enrolled148ConditionsPostoperative Care, MIGSArmsStudy Postoperative Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Response to letter to the editor.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Divya ArunachalamDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University, 11725 N. Illinois Street, Suite K140, Carmel, IN, 46032, USA. divya.arunachalam77@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4398-5260
Michael H HeitDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Indiana University, 11725 N. Illinois Street, Suite K140, Carmel, IN, 46032, USA.
Indiana University · USInstitute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThere is little information on the impact that postoperative instructions have on physical activity to help guide physicians in providing these recommendations after surgery. Our study objective was to evaluate the impact of postoperative instructions on physical activity. We hypothesized that there would be no differential effect of instructions on activity.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, patients undergoing prolapse repair were randomized to receive either liberal or restricted postoperative activity instructions between February 2017 and February 2019. Physical activity was measured using the Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) and tri-axial accelerometers measured at baseline and 2 and 6 weeks after surgery. A sample size of 146 patients was planned to compare these activity measurements. AAS scores and accelerometer readings of the two groups were compared using separate variance t tests.

resultsA total of 157 women were recruited between February 2017 and February 2019, including 146 patients with completed study data (n = 72 liberal, n = 74 restricted). There was no difference in physical activity at 2 weeks between the liberal and the restricted instruction groups, as measured by AAS scores (70.47 ± 12.83, 69.54 ± 12.22, p = 0.66), total steps (4,582.20 ± 2,164.5, 5,014.47 ± 3,025.46, p = 0.32), active minutes (4.22 ± 6.17, 4.96 ± 9.65, p = 0.25), and 10-min intervals (0.76 ± 1.11, 0.77 ± 0.93, p = 0.95) respectively. Similarly, there was no difference in activity at 6 weeks between the liberal and the restricted instruction groups. as measured by AAS scores (81.86 ± 8.25, 81.31 ± 10.31, p = 0.72), total steps (6,316.25 ± 3,173.53, 6,589.94 ± 3,826.43, p = 0.64), active minutes (8.79 ± 10.5,11.36 ± 18.18, p = 0.98), and 10-min intervals (1.37 ± 1.34, 1.34 ± 1.40, p = 0.89) respectively.

conclusionPostoperative instructions do not have an impact on physical activity measures in patients who have undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePlastic Surgery ProceduresExerciseFemaleHumansPostoperative PeriodAccelerometerAnatomical outcomesPhysical activityPostoperative instructions

Identifiers

PMID32062677
OpenAlexW3005845133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.