ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Novel laparoscopic methods for inguinal hernia post pelvic fracture: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPelvic fractures can occur in minor injuries, such as falls, in the elderly. Extensive adhesion of preperitoneal space is common after pelvic fracture surgery; hence, surgical interventions for inguinal hernia may be challenging. We treated a case of inguinal hernia after pelvic fracture surgery, using novel laparoscopic methods: iliopubic tract repair (IPTR) and modified intraperitoneal onlay mesh (mIPOM) approach. PRESENTATION OF CASE: This is the case of an elderly male with pelvic fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation were performed. Eighteen months after the procedure, a right inguinal bulge appeared, swelling increased, and he opted for surgery. We chose laparoscopic surgery to determine the status of the hernia and anatomy around the pelvis. He was diagnosed with an indirect inguinal hernia, and the inner inguinal ring was widely open. We chose the mIPOM approach and IPTR. He was discharged on day 3 post-operation. He developed a seroma after surgery, which disappeared after a month. Six months post-operation, no recurrence or neurologic pain observed. DISCUSSION: The transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) was initiated at first; however, the adhesion inside the inferior epigastric vessels was very strong, challenging to break into the preperitoneal space. We switched to the mIPOM method because the peritoneum was fragile and difficult to suture. Additionally, the internal ring was widely opened; hence, we proceeded with IPTR on confirmation that no tension on the abdominal wall was applied.
conclusionsLaparoscopic surgery is useful in flexibility of surgical options, such as TAPP, IPTR, IPOM, in addition to hybrid conversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.