Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32062420›Full record

ArticleiScience2020

Detection and Classification of Cardiac Arrhythmias by a Challenge-Best Deep Learning Neural Network Model.

Tsai-Min Chen, Chih-Han Huang, Edward S C Shih, Yu-Feng Hu, Ming-Jing Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Current and Future Use of Artificial Intelligence in Electrocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tsai-Min ChenInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; Taiwan AI Academy, Science and Technology Ecosystem Development Foundation, New Taipei City 24158, Taiwan.
Chih-Han HuangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; Genome and Systems Biology Degree Program, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Edward S C ShihInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.
Yu-Feng HuInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Ming-Jing HwangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; Genome and Systems Biology Degree Program, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan. Electronic address: mjhwang@ibms.sinica.edu.tw.
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are widely used to clinically detect cardiac arrhythmias (CAs). They are also being used to develop computer-assisted methods for heart disease diagnosis. We have developed a convolution neural network model to detect and classify CAs, using a large 12-lead ECG dataset (6,877 recordings) provided by the China Physiological Signal Challenge (CPSC) 2018. Our model, which was ranked first in the challenge competition, achieved a median overall F1-score of 0.84 for the nine-type CA classification of CPSC2018's hidden test set of 2,954 ECG recordings. Further analysis showed that concurrent CAs were adequately predictive for 476 patients with multiple types of CA diagnoses in the dataset. Using only single-lead data yielded a performance that was only slightly worse than using the full 12-lead data, with leads aVR and V1 being the most prominent. We extensively consider these results in the context of their agreement with and relevance to clinical observations.

Indexed as

ArrhythmologyArtificial IntelligenceDiagnostics

Identifiers

PMID32062420
PMCPMC7031313
OpenAlexW3005487465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.