Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32061829›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2020

Age differences in the neural correlates of the specificity of recollection: An event-related potential study.

Erin D Horne, Joshua D Koen, Nedra Hauck, Michael D Rugg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cue overlap supports preretrieval selection in episodic memory: ERP evidence.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  3. Age-related neural dedifferentiation for individual stimuli: an across-participant pattern similarity analysis.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin D HorneCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA. Electronic address: erin.horne@utdallas.edu.
Joshua D KoenCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA; University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA.
Nedra HauckCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Michael D RuggCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Relationship Between Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory,Age, Memory PerformanceRF1AG039103 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2017 to 2017
$2.7M
Relationship Between Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory,Age, Memory PerformancR01AG039103 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Age-Related Differences in Episodic Memory EncodingF32AG049583 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI KOEN, JOSHUA · 2014 to 2016
$164k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG049583NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039103NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG039103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In young adults, the neural correlates of successful recollection vary with the specificity (or amount) of information retrieved. We examined whether the neural correlates of recollection are modulated in a similar fashion in older adults. We compared event-related potential (ERP) correlates of recollection in samples of healthy young and older adults (N = 20 per age group). At study, participants were cued to make one of two judgments about each of a series of words. Subsequently, participants completed a memory test for studied and unstudied words in which they first made a Remember/Know/New (RKN) judgment, followed by a source memory judgment when a word attracted a 'Remember' (R) response. In young adults, the 'left parietal effect' - a putative ERP correlate of successful recollection - was largest for test items endorsed as recollected (R judgment) and attracting a correct source judgment, intermediate for items endorsed as recollected but attracting an incorrect or uncertain source judgment, and, relative to correct rejections, absent for items endorsed as familiar only (K judgment). In marked contrast, the left parietal effect was not detectable in older adults. Rather, regardless of source accuracy, studied items attracting an R response elicited a sustained, centrally maximum negative-going deflection relative to both correct rejections and studied items where recollection failed (K judgment). A similar retrieval-related negativity has been described previously in older adults, but the present findings are among the few to link this effect specifically to recollection. Finally, relative to correct rejections, all classes of correctly recognized old items elicited an age-invariant, late-onsetting positive deflection that was maximal over the right frontal scalp. This finding, which replicates several prior results, suggests that post-retrieval monitoring operations were engaged to an equivalent extent in the two age groups. Together, the present results suggest that there are circumstances where young and older adults engage qualitatively distinct retrieval-related processes during successful recollection.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsMental RecallAgedCuesHumansJudgmentMemoryYoung AdultAgingEpisodic memoryEvent-related potentialsPost-retrieval monitoringRecollection

Identifiers

PMID32061829
PMCPMC7078048
OpenAlexW3006116233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.