Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32061665›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular neurosciences2020

Modulation of the combinatorial code of odorant receptor response patterns in odorant mixtures.

Claire A de March, William B Titlow, Tomoko Sengoku, Patrick Breheny, Hiroaki Matsunami, Timothy S McClintock

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular neurosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Harnessing Odorant Receptor Activation to Suppress Real Malodor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire A de MarchDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
William B TitlowDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA.
Tomoko SengokuDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA.
Patrick BrehenyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Hiroaki MatsunamiDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Institute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan; Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: hiroaki.matsunami@duke.edu.
Timothy S McClintockDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA. Electronic address: mcclint@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · USDuke University · USTokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

In vivo patterns of receptor activation by odorantsR01DC014468 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MCCLINTOCK, TIMOTHY S · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
Peripheral Odor Coding in MammalsR01DC014423 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MATSUNAMI, HIROAKI · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Biogenesis of olfactory G protein-coupled receptorsR01DC016224 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MATSUNAMI, HIROAKI · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
Understanding of G protein-coupled odorant receptors functionK99DC018333 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DE MARCH, CLAIRE A. · 2020 to 2021
$172k
NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC018333NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014423NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014468NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of odors relies on combinatorial codes consisting of odorant receptor (OR) response patterns to encode odor identity. Modulation of these patterns by odorant interactions at ORs potentially explains several olfactory phenomena: mixture suppression, unpredictable sensory outcomes, and the perception of odorant mixtures as unique objects. We determined OR response patterns to 4 odorants and 3 binary mixtures in vivo in mice, identifying 30 responsive ORs. These patterns typically had a few strongly responsive ORs and a greater number of weakly responsive ORs. ORs responsive to an odorant were often unrelated sequences distributed across several OR subfamilies. Mixture responses predicted pharmacological interactions between odorants, which were tested in vitro by heterologous expression of ORs in cultured cells, providing independent evidence confirming odorant agonists for 13 ORs and identifying both suppressive and additive effects. This included 11 instances of antagonism of ORs by an odorant, 1 instance of additive responses to a binary mixture, 1 instance of suppression of a strong agonist by a weak agonist, and the discovery of an inverse agonist for an OR. Interactions between odorants at ORs are common even when the odorants are not known to interact perceptually in humans, and in some cases interactions at mouse ORs correlate with the ability of humans to perceive an odorant in a mixture.

Indexed as

OdorantsSmellAldehydesAnimalsCells, CulturedFemaleLactonesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPentanolsReceptors, OdorantAldehydesbourgeonalisoamyl acetateLactonesPentanolsReceptors, OdorantundecanalG protein-coupled receptorsOlfactionOlfactory codingOlfactory sensory neurons

Identifiers

PMID32061665
PMCPMC7138139
OpenAlexW3005870645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.