ArticleBiophysical journal2020
Effects of Topology and Sequence in Protein Folding Linked via Conformational Fluctuations.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Dissecting the stability determinants of a challenging de novo protein fold using massively parallel design and experimentation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Crowding-induced protein destabilization in the absence of soft attractions.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experiments have compared the folding of proteins with different amino acid sequences but the same basic structure, or fold. Results indicate that folding is robust to sequence variations for proteins with some nonlocal folds, such as all-β, whereas the folding of more local, all-α proteins typically exhibits a stronger sequence dependence. Here, we use a coarse-grained model to systematically study how variations in sequence perturb the folding energy landscapes of three model sequences with 3α, 4β + α, and β-barrel folds, respectively. These three proteins exhibit folding features in line with experiments, including expected rank order in the cooperativity of the folding transition and stability-dependent shifts in the location of the free-energy barrier to folding. Using a generalized-ensemble simulation approach, we determine the thermodynamics of around 2000 sequence variants representing all possible hydrophobic or polar single- and double-point mutations. From an analysis of the subset of stability-neutral mutations, we find that folding is perturbed in a topology-dependent manner, with the β-barrel protein being the most robust. Our analysis shows, in particular, that the magnitude of mutational perturbations of the transition state is controlled in part by the size or "width" of the underlying conformational ensemble. This result suggests that the mutational robustness of the folding of the β-barrel protein is underpinned by its conformationally restricted transition state ensemble, revealing a link between sequence and topological effects in protein folding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.