Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32061265›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Patient satisfaction with the implementation of electronic medical Records in the Western Region, Saudi Arabia, 2018.

R M Wali, R M Alqahtani, S K Alharazi, S A Bukhari, S M Quqandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Correlation between consultation time and patient´s satisfaction in primary care].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Quality of Actions to Control Cervical Cancer in Bahia, Brazil.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R M WaliMinistry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. dr_razazwali@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3942-4815
R M AlqahtaniKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
S K AlharaziKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
S A BukhariKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
S M QuqandiKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system initiated a significant transition in the healthcare system from traditional paper-based medical records to a digital version. Though EMR offers several benefits compared to Paper Medical Records (PMR), patient satisfaction with the EMR has been an area of concern. The objective of this study is to explore patient satisfaction with the EMR compared to the PMR of patients attending five Primary Healthcare Centers in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted with patients who attended five Primary Health Care centers (PHCs) in the Western Region during 2018. A sample of 377 participants was invited to complete a self-developed structured questionnaire with multiple choice and Likert Scale questions. The questionnaire was distributed to participants in the PHC waiting areas.

resultsThe sample size realized as (n = 377) participants, the majority (65.0%) were female. The overall patient satisfaction was 3.708. Patient satisfaction with the EMR was statistically significant compared to the PMR (3.7241 vs. 3.6919, p < 0.001). Several factors provided evidence of the overall satisfaction with the implementation of the EMR, including an increase in physician attention during the clinical consultation (82.3%), increased explanation of tests and medication (85.8%), increased time spent with the patient during the consultation (80.4%) and increased active listening by the physician (77.3%). Besides, the patients felt confident to ask the physician question related to health during clinical consultation (84.0%).

conclusionPatient satisfaction during the clinical consultation and overall satisfaction with various PHC services improved with the implementation of EMR.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsYoung AdultElectronic medical recordPaper medical recordPatients’ satisfactionPhysician-patient communicationPrimary healthcare centers

Identifiers

PMID32061265
PMCPMC7024550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.