ReviewClinical endoscopy2020
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection for Gastrointestinal Tumors - Challenges and Solutions.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Through-the-scope twin clip for closure of gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection defects: a retrospective comparative study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of ligation-assisted versus snare traction-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria: a propensity score-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Serosal overturning assisted endoscopic full-thickness mucosal resection of extraneous giant mass at the esophagogastric junction.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Effect of endoscopic full-thickness resection assisted by distal serosal turnover with floss traction for gastric submucosal masses.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Endoscopic resection penetrating the muscularis propria for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: advances and challenges.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Laparoscopy-assisted nonexposed endoscopic full-thickness resection for local resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Twin-grasper assisted mucosal inverted closure achieves complete healing of large perforations after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023Article
- Article
- Role of intraoperative patients positioning in endoscopic full-thickness resection of large gastric tumors under general anesthesia.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Comparative Study on the Clinical Effects of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade.Clinical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Over-the-Scope Clip-Associated Endoscopic Muscular Dissection for Seven Cases of Small Gastric Submucosal Tumor: A Video-Based Case Series.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2021Article
- Clinical adoption of robotics in endoscopy: Challenges and solutions.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Review
- Emerging endoscopic resection strategies for organ preservation in early colorectal cancer.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are established techniques for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. However, resection of submucosal tumors via ESD often results in low rates of microscopically margin-negative (R0) resection and high rates of perforation. Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) overcomes this adverse event and aids in the therapeutic management of complex tumors. Multiple techniques for EFTR have been developed, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Submucosal tunneling and nonexposed techniques are generally preferable, because the layer of overlying intact mucosa reduces the incidence of intraperitoneal contamination by the gastric fluid and dissemination of the tumor cells. However, adoption of EFTR by endoscopists in clinical practice remains low. The major challenge seems to be the technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic and/or endoscopic suturing using the currently available instruments. We developed a novel robotic endoscopic platform with suturing capabilities to overcome the technical challenges of suturing. This platform allows easy maneuvering and triangulation of the instruments, thus facilitating endoscopic suturing using robotic arms. Our studies have demonstrated that this robotic endoscopic platform with suturing capabilities is an effective and safe method for performing EFTR with endoscopic suturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.