Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32061169›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2020

Molecular heterogeneity in breast carcinoma cells with increased invasive capacities.

Giulia Negro, Bertram Aschenbrenner, Simona Kranjc Brezar, Maja Cemazar, Andrej Coer, Gorana Gasljevic, Dragana Savic, Maxim Sorokin, Anton Buzdin, Maurizio Callari and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Transplantable Subcutaneous Tumor Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cytokines in various molecular subtypes of breast cancer.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Giulia NegroMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bertram AschenbrennerMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Simona Kranjc BrezarDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja CemazarDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrej CoerUniversity of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izola, Slovenia.
Gorana GasljevicDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Dragana SavicMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Maxim SorokinShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Anton BuzdinShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Maurizio CallariCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Irma KvitsaridzeMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anahid JewettDivision of Oral Biology and Medicine Microbiology, Immunology, & Molecular Genetics, Tumor Immunology Laboratory, College of Letters & Science, UCLA School of Dentistry and Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Mariela Vasileva-SlavevaMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ute GanswindtMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ira SkvortsovaMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sergej SkvortsovMedical University of Innsbruck, Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck, Austria.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana · SITyrolean Cancer Research Institute · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATCancer Research UK · GBInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RUOrthopaedic Hospital Valdoltra · SIUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4140Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Metastatic progression of breast cancer is still a challenge in clinical oncology. Therefore, an elucidation how carcinoma cells belonging to different breast cancer subtypes realize their metastatic capacities is needed. The aim of this study was to elucidate a similarity of activated molecular pathways underlying an enhancement of invasiveness of carcinoma cells belonging to different breast carcinoma subtypes. Materials and methods In order to reach this aim, parental and invasive (INV) MDA-MB-231 (triple-negative), T47D (hormone receptor-positive), and Au565 (Her2-positive) breast carcinoma cells were used and their molecular phenotypes were compared using a proteomic approach. Results Independently from breast cancer subtypes, INV cells have demonstrated fibroblast-like morphology accompanied by enhancement of invasive and migratory capacities, increased expression of cancer stem cell markers, and delayed tumor growth in in vivo animal models. However, the global proteomic analysis has highlighted that INV cells were different in protein expressions from the parental cells, and Her2-positive Au565-INV cells showed the most pronounced molecular differences compared to the triple-negative MDA-MB-231-INV and hormone receptor-positive T47D-INV cells. Although Au565-INV breast carcinoma cells possessed the highest number of deregulated proteins, they had the lowest overlapping in proteins commonly expressed in MDA-MB-231-INV and T47D-INV cells. Conclusions We can conclude that hormone receptor-positive cells with increased invasiveness acquire the molecular characteristics of triple-negative breast cancer cells, whereas Her2-positive INV cells specifically changed their own molecular phenotype with very limited partaking in the involved pathways found in the MDA-MB-231-INV and T47D-INV cells. Since hormone receptor-positive invasive cells share their molecular properties with triple-negative breast cancer cells, we assume that these types of metastatic disease can be treated rather equally with an option to add anti-hormonal agents. In contrast, Her2-positive metastasis should be carefully evaluated for more effective therapeutic approaches which are distinct from the triple-negative and hormone-positive metastatic breast cancers.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCancer-Associated FibroblastsCell Line, TumorCell MovementErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm ProteinsPhenotypeProteomicsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoplasm Proteinsbreast cancer cellscancer stem cellsinvasivenessmetastasismigrationmolecular profiling

Identifiers

PMID32061169
PMCPMC7087425
OpenAlexW3007562292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.