Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32061081›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2021

Generalized additive regression for group testing data.

Yan Liu, Christopher S McMahan, Joshua M Tebbs, Colin M Gallagher, Christopher R Bilder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bayesian group testing regression models for spatial data.Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan LiuSchool of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Christopher S McMahanSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, O-110 Martin Hall, Box 340975, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Joshua M TebbsDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, 1523 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Colin M GallagherSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, O-110 Martin Hall, Box 340975, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Christopher R BilderDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 340 Hardin Hall North, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

Funding

Group testing for infectious disease detection: multiplex assays and back-end screeningR01AI121351 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BILDER, CHRISTOPHER R · 2016 to 2025
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In screening applications involving low-prevalence diseases, pooling specimens (e.g., urine, blood, swabs, etc.) through group testing can be far more cost effective than testing specimens individually. Estimation is a common goal in such applications and typically involves modeling the probability of disease as a function of available covariates. In recent years, several authors have developed regression methods to accommodate the complex structure of group testing data but often under the assumption that covariate effects are linear. Although linearity is a reasonable assumption in some applications, it can lead to model misspecification and biased inference in others. To offer a more flexible framework, we propose a Bayesian generalized additive regression approach to model the individual-level probability of disease with potentially misclassified group testing data. Our approach can be used to analyze data arising from any group testing protocol with the goal of estimating multiple unknown smooth functions of covariates, standard linear effects for other covariates, and assay classification accuracy probabilities. We illustrate the methods in this article using group testing data on chlamydia infection in Iowa.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsBayes TheoremHumansMass ScreeningPrevalenceRegression AnalysisBayesian regressionBinary regressionGaussian predictive processGaussian processPooled testingSpecimen pooling

Identifiers

PMID32061081
PMCPMC8511943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.