ArticleMedical physics2020
Adaptive scan duration in SPECT: Evaluation for radioembolization.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical Note: Nuclear imaging with an x-ray flat panel detector: A proof-of-concept study.Medical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIt may be challenging to select the optimal scan duration for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) protocols because the activity distribution characteristics can differ in every scan. Using simulations and experiments, we investigated whether the scan duration can be optimized for every scan separately by evaluating the activity distribution during scanning. We refer to this as adaptive scanning.
methodsThe feasibility of adaptive scanning was evaluated for the detection of extrahepatic depositions in the pretreatment procedure of radioembolization, in which
resultsThe digital phantom data showed that the scan termination times substantially depended on the activity distribution characteristics. The experimental phantom data showed the feasibility of adaptive scanning with physical scanner measurements and illustrated that fast detector motion was not limiting the adaptive scanning performance. The patient data showed a large spread in the scan terminations times. By adaptive scanning, the mean scan duration of the patient distributions was shortened from 20 min (current clinical protocol) to 4.8 ± 0.2 min. The detection accuracy of extrahepatic depositions was unaffected and the mean difference in the extrahepatic deposition masks (compared with the 20-min scan) was only 7.0 ± 1.0%.
conclusionOur study suggests that the SPECT scan duration can be personalized by assessing the activity distribution characteristics during scanning for the detection of extrahepatic depositions in the pretreatment procedure of radioembolization. The adaptive scanning approach might also be of benefit for other SPECT protocols, as long as a measure of interest is available for optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.