Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060880›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

Preventing College Sexual Victimization by Reducing Hookups: a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention.

Maria Testa, Jennifer A Livingston, Weijun Wang, Melissa A Lewis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. College men's use of protective behavioral strategies for sexual aggression, risky sexual behavior, and heavy episodic drinking.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria TestaDepartment of Psychology and Clinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA. mltesta@buffalo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4549-4457
Jennifer A LivingstonSchool of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA.
Weijun WangDepartment of Psychology and Clinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA.
Melissa A LewisDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Systems, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.

Funding

Brief Intervention to Reduce College Sexual Victimization RiskR34AA024854 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI TESTA, MARIA L · 2017 to 2018
$698k
NIAAA NIH HHS R34AA02485NIAAA NIH HHS R34 AA024854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual activity, including hooking up, increases college women's vulnerability to sexual victimization. Reducing hookups may reduce rates of sexual victimization among this vulnerable population. Because college students overestimate how frequently their peers hook up, correcting their misperceptions may lead to more accurate perceived social norms, and consequently, less hookup behavior. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of a brief, computer-administered personalized normative feedback (PNF) intervention regarding hookups during the first semester of college. We tested an indirect effects model in which PNF was hypothesized to predict perceiving fewer peer hookups, which were expected to predict fewer actual hookups and consequently, less sexual victimization during the first semester of college. Entering first-year women (N = 760) were randomly assigned to receive web-delivered PNF or no information. At the end of the semester, perceived number of hookups of others, number of hookups during the semester, and sexual victimization experiences were assessed. Women who received the intervention perceived that their peers engaged in significantly fewer hookups than did control women. Consistent with the proposed indirect effects model, intervention had a significant indirect effect on the odds of first-semester victimization via lower perceived descriptive norms, which in turn predicted fewer hookups. The study provides proof of concept for the importance of hookups as a risk factor for sexual victimization and provides novel, preliminary support for intervention to change descriptive norms as a way of reducing hookups and consequently, sexual vulnerability.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsFormative FeedbackRisk Reduction BehaviorUniversitiesFemaleHumansMaleSex OffensesSexual BehaviorStudentsVulnerable PopulationsCollege studentsDescriptive normsPersonalized feedback interventionSexual risk-takingSexual victimization

Identifiers

PMID32060880
PMCPMC7058500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.