Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060855›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021

Mechanisms of left ventricular dyssynchrony: A multinational SPECT study of patients with bundle branch block.

Saara Sillanmäki, Alessia Gimelli, Shahzad Ahmad, Saba Samir, Tomi Laitinen, Prem Soman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of dyssynchrony with nuclear cardiac imaging: New evidence for an old parameter.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Predicting left ventricular dyssynchrony: Can nuclear cardiology bring us closer "In Sync"?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Saara SillanmäkiInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Alessia GimelliFondazione Toscana/CNR Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy.
Shahzad AhmadDivision of Cardiology and The Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Saba SamirDivision of Cardiology and The Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tomi LaitinenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.
Prem SomanDivision of Cardiology and The Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. premsoman@usa.net.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USKuopio University Hospital · FIFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo better understand the mechanisms of left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD), we explored the relative contributions of QRS duration (QRSd), LV ejection fraction (EF), volumes and scar to LVMD measured by gated single-photon emission tomography in a population of consecutive patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB) compared to controls.

methodsMyocardial perfusion imaging studies of 275 LBBB and 83 RBBB patients from three centers were analyzed. LVMD was defined as an abnormal phase bandwidth or phase standard deviation. Hospital and gender-specific normal values were obtained from 172 controls.

resultsThe prevalence of LVMD was 85 and 40% in LBBB and RBBB, respectively. Ejection fraction, scar severity, and LBBB morphology independently explained 70% of variance seen in PhaseBW. Ejection fraction had the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.918) in the receiver operating characteristics analysis of LVMD with an optimal cut-off of 47% (sensitivity 73% and specificity 98%). Notably, QRSd was not predictive.

conclusionLV mechanical dysfunction plays a greater role than conduction abnormality in the genesis of LVMD, a finding that is intriguing in the context of contemporary literature which suggests that QRSd is the parameter that is most predictive of CRT response.

Indexed as

AgedBundle-Branch BlockCardiac-Gated Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted TomographyCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveStroke VolumeVentricular Dysfunction, Leftdyssynchronyheart failurePhysiology of LV/RV functionSPECT

Identifiers

PMID32060855
OpenAlexW3006400841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.