Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060800›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Introduction of point-of-care neonatal lung ultrasound in a developing country.

P Mazmanyan, V Kerobyan, S Shankar-Aguilera, N Yousef, D De Luca

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transient tachypnoea: new concepts on the commonest neonatal respiratory disorder.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

P MazmanyanDepartment of Neonatology, Yerevan State Medical University, 2 Koryun St, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia. pavelart@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8230-6534
V KerobyanDepartment of Neonatology, Yerevan State Medical University, 2 Koryun St, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia.
S Shankar-AguileraDivision of Pediatrics, Transportation and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Center, South Paris, University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
N YousefDivision of Pediatrics, Transportation and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Center, South Paris, University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
D De LucaDivision of Pediatrics, Transportation and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Center, South Paris, University Hospitals, APHP, Paris, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRYerevan State Medical University · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite neonatal lung ultrasound (LU) being diffused worldwide, its introduction in limited-resource areas has not been formally investigated. We conceived a project to introduce it in a level 3 NICU of a developing country and verify if, after a short protocolized training, clinicians may efficaciously use LU. Inter-rater agreement between ultrasound trainees and trainers was analyzed within both the local test and the diffusion phases of the project. High inter-rater agreements were found between expert trainers and the two neonatologists who were trained in a skilled European center (Cohen's Kappa, 0.951; 95%CI, 0.882-0.999), as well as between the two and the second round of locally trained colleagues (Cohen's Kappa, 0.896; 95%CI, 0.797-0.996). Moreover, a high agreement was found between the clinical respiratory diagnosis (used as the "gold standard") and the LU diagnosis given by the first two trainees (intraclass correlation, 0.992; 95%CI, 0.987-0.996) and the locally trained physicians (intraclass correlation, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.95-0.98). A final survey demonstrated that the project was perceived as efficacious and that LU was going to be integrated into routine clinical practice.Conclusions: А short LU training provided sufficient proficiency and allowed the LU introduction in clinical practice in the neonatal intensive care unit in a developing country.What is Known:• Lung ultrasound is a promising technique for evaluating neonatal respiratory distress at least in high-income countries. Previous studies revealed high specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing specific neonatal disorders.• An important barrier to the more extensive use of lung ultrasound in neonatal critical care is a lack of efficient and suitable training solutions.What is New:• Descriptive LU performed by neonatologist in a developing country after a short formal training is feasible with good quality.• A short formal LU training program provided good proficiency and allowed a correct descriptive diagnosis in a neonatal unit in a developing country.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingArmeniaAttitude of Health PersonnelDeveloping CountriesEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLungLung DiseasesMaleNeonatologyObserver VariationProspective StudiesDeveloping countryLung ultrasoundNeonatal lung diseaseNewborn

Identifiers

PMID32060800
OpenAlexW3005853935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.