Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060752›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Spread of clonal linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in an intensive care unit associated with linezolid exposure.

Kevin Bouiller, Dejan Ilic, Paul Henry Wicky, Pascal Cholley, Catherine Chirouze, Xavier Bertrand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clonal dissemination of linezolid-resistantInfection prevention in practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigation of a linezolid-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin BouillerDepartment of Infectious diseases, Service de maladies infectieuses, university hospital of Besancon, 3 bd Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon, France. kbouiller@chu-besancon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-4318
Dejan IlicSurgical intensive care unit, university hospital of Besancon, Besancon, France.
Paul Henry WickyDepartment of Infectious diseases, Service de maladies infectieuses, university hospital of Besancon, 3 bd Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon, France.
Pascal CholleyHospital hygiene department, university hospital of Besancon, Besancon, France.
Catherine ChirouzeDepartment of Infectious diseases, Service de maladies infectieuses, university hospital of Besancon, 3 bd Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon, France.
Xavier BertrandUMR CNRS 6249 chrono-environnement, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besancon, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine factors associated with spread of linezolid (LNZ)-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU). A case-control study was conducted in one French adult surgical ICU. From January 2012 to December 2016, patients with at least a single positive LNZ-resistant S. epidermidis blood culture were matched to control with LNZ-susceptible S. epidermidis blood culture in a 1:4 manner. Cases were compared to controls regarding baseline clinical characteristics and LNZ exposure before positive blood culture. Bacterial isolates were genotyped by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and MLST. We identified 13 LNZ-resistant S. epidermidis isolates, 1 in 2012, 3 in 2014, 6 in 2015, and 3 in 2016. LNZ use increased steadily from 8 DDDs/100 patient days in 2010 to 19 in 2013 and further decrease by more of 50% in 2015 and 2016. The only independent risk factors associated to LNZ-resistant S. epidermidis isolation were length of stay in ICU before infection (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.07-1.98), prior exposure to LNZ (OR 109; 95% CI 3.9-3034), and Charlson comorbidities score (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.11-9.14). PFGE typing showed that all LNZ-resistant isolates were clonal belonging to ST2 and that LNZ-susceptible isolates were highly diverse. We report herein that previous exposure to LNZ substantially increased the risk of occurrence of LNZ resistance in S. epidermidis even in the case of clonal spread of LNZ-resistant isolates. These findings highlight the need for reducing the use of LNZ to preserve its efficacy in the future.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesCross InfectionDNA, BacterialFemaleGenotypeHumansIntensive Care UnitsLinezolidMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMolecular EpidemiologyRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialLinezolidAntibiotic resistanceGenotypingLinezolidRisk factorsStaphylococcus epidermidis

Identifiers

PMID32060752
OpenAlexW3008305491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.