Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060749›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2020

Spatial cognition in western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla): an analysis of distance, linearity, and speed of travel routes.

Roberta Salmi, Andrea Presotto, Clara J Scarry, Peter Hawman, Diane M Doran-Sheehy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A brief history of primate research in the Ndoki forest.Primates; journal of primatology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Human and chimpanzee shared and divergent neurobiological systems for general and specific cognitive brain functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Chimpanzees (Science advances · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberta SalmiDepartment of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. rsalmi@uga.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-2014
Andrea PresottoDepartment of Geography and Geosciences, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD, USA.
Clara J ScarryDepartment of Anthropology, California State University, Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Peter HawmanDepartment of Geography, Center for Geospatial Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Diane M Doran-SheehyDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
University of Georgia · USCalifornia State University, Sacramento · USSalisbury University · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

Leakey Foundation naPrimate Action Fund naPrimate Conservation Inc. naSigma Xi naStony Brook University naWildlife Direct na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial memory allows animals to retain information regarding the location, distribution, and quality of feeding sites to optimize foraging decisions. Western gorillas inhabit a complex environment with spatiotemporal fluctuations of resource availability, prefer fruits when available, and travel long distances to reach them. Here, we examined movement patterns-such as linearity, distance, and speed of traveling-to assess whether gorillas optimize travel when reaching out-of-sight valued resources. Our results show that gorillas travel patterns are affected by the activity they perform next, the type of food they feed on, and their preference level to specific fruits, suggesting they are able to optimize foraging based on spatial knowledge of their resources. Additionally, gorillas left in the direction of the next resource as soon as they started traveling and decelerated before approaching food resources, as evidence that they have a representation of their exact locations. Moreover, home range familiarity did not influence gorillas' movement patterns, as travel linearity in the core and periphery did not differ, suggesting that they may not depend wholly on a network of paths to navigate their habitat. These results show some overlap with chimpanzees' spatial abilities. Differences between the two ape species exist, however, potentially reflecting more their differences in diet (degree of frugivory) rather than their cognitive abilities. Further studies should focus on determining whether gorillas are able to use shortcuts and/or approach the same goal from multiple directions to better identify the spatial abilities used by this species.

Indexed as

Gorilla gorillaHominidaeAnimalsCognitionDietPan troglodytesAllocentric mechanismApesCognitive mapSpatial ecologySpatial knowledge

Identifiers

PMID32060749
OpenAlexW3006381596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.