Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

Ballistic research techniques: visualizing gunshot wounding patterns.

Tom Stevenson, Debra J Carr, Karl Harrison, Richard Critchley, Iain E Gibb, Sarah A Stapley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Ballistic Gels in Experimental Fracture Setting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Bullet trajectory detection in the lung: Multiplanar reformatted imaging of multidetector computed tomography in children.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023
    Article
  5. Interpol review of forensic firearm examination 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tom StevensonImpact and Armour Group, Centre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK. tstevenson@doctors.org.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3615-7539
Debra J CarrDefence and Security Accelerator, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-2166
Karl HarrisonCranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK.
Richard CritchleyImpact and Armour Group, Centre for Defence Engineering, Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK.
Iain E GibbCentre for Defence Radiology, at c/o Sickbay, HMS Nelson, HMNB Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO1 3HH, UK.
Sarah A StapleyRoyal Centre for Defence Medicine, ICT Building, Research Park, St Vincent Drive, Birmingham, B15 2SQ, UK.
Cranfield University · GBBirmingham Research Park · GBDefence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBUniversity of Portsmouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are difficulties associated with mapping gunshot wound (GSW) patterns within opaque models. Depending on the damage measurement parameters required, there are multiple techniques that can provide methods of "seeing" the GSW pattern within an opaque model. The aim of this paper was to test several of these techniques within a cadaveric animal limb model to determine the most effective. The techniques of interest were flash X-ray, ultrasound, physical dissection, and computed-tomography (CT). Fallow deer hind limbs were chosen for the model with four limbs used for each technique tested. Quarantined 7.62 × 39 mm ammunition was used for each shot, and each limb was only shot once, on an outdoor range with shots impacting at muzzle velocity. Flash X-ray provided evidence of yaw within the limb during the projectile's flight; ultrasound though able to visualise the GSW track, was too subjective and was abandoned; dissection proved too unreliable due to the tissue being cadaveric so also too subjective; and lastly, CT with contrast provided excellent imaging in multiple viewing planes and 3D image reconstruction; this allowed versatile measurement of the GSW pattern to collect dimensions of damage as required. Of the different techniques examined in this study, CT with contrast proved the most effective to allow precise GSW pattern analysis within a cadaveric animal limb model. These findings may be beneficial to others wishing to undertake further ballistic study both within clinical and forensic fields.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsCadaverDeerForensic BallisticsHindlimbModels, AnimalRadiographyUltrasonographyWounds, GunshotCTGunshotLimbUltrasoundWoundX-ray

Identifiers

PMID32060625
PMCPMC7181419
OpenAlexW3005749069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.