Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060611›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2020

[Electrical storm : Recognition and management].

Markus Zarse, Fuad Hasan, Atisha Khan, Zana Karosiene, Bernd Lemke, Harilaos Bogossian

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus ZarseKlinikum Lüdenscheid, Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Paulmannshöherstraße 10-14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland. Markus.Zarse@klinikum-luedenscheid.de.
Fuad HasanKlinikum Lüdenscheid, Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Paulmannshöherstraße 10-14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland.
Atisha KhanKlinikum Lüdenscheid, Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Paulmannshöherstraße 10-14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland.
Zana KarosieneKlinikum Lüdenscheid, Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Paulmannshöherstraße 10-14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland.
Bernd LemkeKlinikum Lüdenscheid, Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Paulmannshöherstraße 10-14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland.
Harilaos BogossianKlinikum Lüdenscheid, Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Paulmannshöherstraße 10-14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland.
Klinikum Lüdenscheid · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrical storm (ES) defined as ≥3 sustained episodes of ventricular tachycardia within a 24 h period comprises a wide spectrum of clinical entities. Mostly patients suffer from severe heart insufficiency and comorbidities making an immediate transfer into a heart center with multidisciplinary expertise in the treatment of ES mandatory. As these patients are often traumatized by ongoing tachycardia despite multiple cardioversions, early deep sedation and β‑blockade to break the vicious circle of sympathico-adrenergic hyperactivation is very effective. Multiple ICD discharges suggesting the diagnosis of ES are inadequate in one third of cases. Pharmacological suppression, frequency control or ablation of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) help in most cases. In some cases "oversensing" demands optimization of ICD programming. Even so not all adequate ICD discharges, however, are necessary. Since every ICD discharge worsens the patient's prognosis, any kind of ICD discharge should be prevented as far as hemodynamically feasible. After clinical stabilization of the patient with simultaneous acquisition of ECG and testing for reversible causes of ES, ES should be terminated by external or internal cardioversion followed by urgent but elective therapy. Some cases of ES, however, may require immediate escalation of therapy with emergency ablation or revascularization sometimes with circulatory support systems. If ES still persists, a further step in escalation may be taken by cardiac sympathetic denervation. Due to the poor prognosis of patients after ES, close monitoring of the patient, preferably with telemedicine, is indicated.

Indexed as

Electric CountershockTachycardia, VentricularArrhythmias, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableHumansIncidenceAblationCardiac sympathetic denervationCirculatory support systemsImplantable cardioverter–defibrillator therapyTachycardia

Identifiers

PMID32060611
OpenAlexW3005801865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.