ArticleNeuroradiology2020
Endovascular treatment decision-making in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion and low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: insights from UNMASK EVT, an international multidisciplinary survey.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated predictors of outcome in vertebrobasilar artery occlusion treated With endovascular therapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Decision-Making for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusions and Mild Neurological Deficit: A Consensus Statement.Journal of stroke · 2025Review
- A Comparative Evaluation of Standard and Balloon-Assisted Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms Based on Neurophysiological Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Patient-Relevant Deficits Dictate Endovascular Thrombectomy Decision-Making in Patients with Low NIHSS Scores with Medium-Vessel Occlusion Stroke.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion and Mild Stroke: A Single-Center Experience.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Adapting pre-hospital stroke triage systems to expanding thrombectomy indications.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Treatment Challenges in Acute Minor Ischemic Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMany stroke patients with large vessel occlusion present with a low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). There is currently no level 1A recommendation for endovascular treatment (EVT) for this patient subgroup. From a physician's standpoint, the deficits might only be slight, but they are often devastating from a patient perspective. Furthermore, early neurologic deterioration is common. The purpose of this study was to explore endovascular treatment attitudes of physicians in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with low admission NIHSS.
methodsIn an international cross-sectional survey among stroke physicians, participants were presented the scenario of a 76-year-old stroke patient with an admission NIHSS of 2. Survey participants were then asked how they would treat the patient (A) given their current local resources, and (B) under assumed ideal conditions, i.e., without external (monetary or infrastructural) constraints. Overall, country-specific and specialty-specific decision rates were calculated and clustered multivariable logistic regression performed to provide adjusted measures of effect size.
resultsTwo hundred seventy-five participants (150 neurologists, 84 interventional neuroradiologists, 30 neurosurgeons, 11 affiliated to other specialties) from 33 countries provided their treatment approach to this case scenario. Most physicians favored an endovascular treatment approach, either combined with intravenous alteplase (55.3% under assumed ideal and 52.0% under current working conditions) or as single treatment (11.3% under assumed ideal and 8.4% under current conditions).
conclusionDespite the limited evidence for endovascular therapy in acute stroke patients with low NIHSS, most physicians in this survey decided to proceed with endovascular therapy. A randomized controlled trial seems warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32060567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.