Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060511›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2020

Financing Pull Mechanisms for Antibiotic-Related Innovation: Opportunities for Europe.

Christine Årdal, Yohann Lacotte, Marie-Cécile Ploy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Can the UK 'Netflix' Payment Model Boost the Antibacterial Pipeline?Applied health economics and health policy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimal subscription models to pay for antibiotics.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine ÅrdalNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Antimicrobial Resistance Centre, Oslo, Norway.
Yohann LacotteUniversité Limoges, INSERM, CHU Limoges, UMR 1092, Limoges, France.
Marie-Cécile PloyUniversité Limoges, INSERM, CHU Limoges, UMR 1092, Limoges, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic innovation is in serious jeopardy as companies continue to abandon the market due to a lack of profitability. Novel antibiotics must be used sparingly to hinder the spread of resistance, but small companies cannot survive on revenues that do not cover operational costs. When these companies either go bankrupt or move onto other therapeutic areas, these antibiotics may be no longer accessible to patients. Although significant research efforts have detailed incentives to stimulate antibiotic innovation, little attention has been paid to the financing of these incentives. In this article, we take a closer look at 4 potential financing models (diagnosis-related group carve-out, stewardship taxes, transferable exclusivity voucher, and a European-based "pay or play" model) and evaluate them from a European perspective. The attractiveness of these models and the willingness for countries to test them are currently being vetted through the European Joint Action on AMR and Healthcare-Associated Infections (EU-JAMRAI).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug IndustryEuropeHumansMotivationAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistanceantimicrobialseconomic incentivespull incentives

Identifiers

PMID32060511
PMCPMC7643740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.