Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060491›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction.

David S Sparks, Siamak Saifzadeh, Flavia Medeiros Savi, Constantin E Dlaska, Arne Berner, Jan Henkel, Johannes C Reichert, Martin Wullschleger, Jiongyu Ren, Amaia Cipitria and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Surgical induction model of femoral defect in Wistar rats for bone repair histology.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing Cardiopulmonary Safety of Intramedullary Bone Graft Harvesting: A Comparative Study of the RIA 2 System and the ARA Concept.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David S Sparks *Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Siamak Saifzadeh *Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0295-7477
Flavia Medeiros Savi *Centre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Constantin E DlaskaCentre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-4798
Arne BernerCentre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Jan HenkelCentre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Johannes C ReichertDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, König-Ludwig-Haus, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany.
Martin WullschlegerJamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Jiongyu RenCentre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Amaia CipitriaDepartment of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam, Germany.
Jacqui A McGovernCentre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-6745
Roland SteckMedical Engineering Research Facility, Queensland UCoban wrap only comes non-sterile. Sterilize Coban wrap before use.niversity of Technology, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Michael WagelsDepartment of Plastic & Reconswrapping a sterile Coban wrap around the limb distallytructive Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Maria Ann WoodruffARC Centre for Additive Biomanufactthe mounting resin base cement. Use it only in a laboratory fume cabinet and withuring, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Michael A SchuetzCentre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Dietmar W HutmacherCentre in Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia. dietmar.hutmacher@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-2134
Queensland University of Technology · AUGriffith University · AUKlinik König-Ludwig Haus · DEMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DEThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical-size bone defects, which require large-volume tissue reconstruction, remain a clinical challenge. Bone engineering has the potential to provide new treatment concepts, yet clinical translation requires anatomically and physiologically relevant preclinical models. The ovine critical-size long-bone defect model has been validated in numerous studies as a preclinical tool for evaluating both conventional and novel bone-engineering concepts. With sufficient training and experience in large-animal studies, it is a technically feasible procedure with a high level of reproducibility when appropriate preoperative and postoperative management protocols are followed. The model can be established by following a procedure that includes the following stages: (i) preoperative planning and preparation, (ii) the surgical approach, (iii) postoperative management, and (iv) postmortem analysis. Using this model, full results for peer-reviewed publication can be attained within 2 years. In this protocol, we comprehensively describe how to establish proficiency using the preclinical model for the evaluation of a range of bone defect reconstruction options.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesFracture HealingFractures, BoneModels, BiologicalSheepTissue EngineeringWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID32060491
OpenAlexW3006287442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.