Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060314›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Assessment of the Stability of the Palatal Rugae in a 3D-3D Superimposition Technique Following Slow Maxillary Expansion (SME).

Valentina Lanteri, Gianguido Cossellu, Marco Farronato, Alessandro Ugolini, Rosalia Leonardi, Francesca Rusconi, Stefano De Luca, Roberto Biagi, Cinzia Maspero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Retrospective Descriptive Case Series on the Use of AMCOPBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Effect of light-emitting photobiomodulation therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement : A randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina Lanteri *Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gianguido Cossellu *Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-5591
Marco FarronatoDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro UgoliniDepartment of Orthondontics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-6014
Rosalia LeonardiDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesca RusconiDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Stefano De LucaÁrea de Identificación Forense, Unidad de Derechos Humanos, Servicio Médico Legal, Santiago de Chile, Chile. sdeluca@sml.gob.cl.
Roberto BiagiDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia MasperoDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITGobierno de Chile · CLUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Palatal Rugae are considered a useful human identification marker for both orthodontists and forensic personnel. The principal aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of palatal rugae with a 3D-3D superimposition procedure following Slow Maxillary Expansion (SME), in order to assess whether they kept their uniqueness and validity for human identification, even after a specific dental treatment. For this purpose, a sample of 27 digital dental models - belonging to growing patients (13 males and 14 females), aged between 8.5 and 15 years, who underwent SME therapy - was retrospectively studied and compared with a control group of 27 untreated subjects - (13 males and 14 females). Digital dental models were obtained pre-treatment and at device removal; both were processed by means of an intraoral scanner. A superimposition procedure was thus performed to reach the minimum point-to-point distance between two models of palatal rugae. Intra- and inter-observer differences were statistically analyzed by paired Wilcoxon test and Intra-class Correlation coefficient (ICC), showing values larger than 0.93. There was no difference in Root-Mean-Square (RMS) values between untreated control subjects and subjects treated with Leaf Expander (p = 0.062). A RMS value of 0.43 was the threshold to distinguish the pooled group ("Untreated" and "Leaf") from any mismatch. According to the obtained results, this study failed to reject the null hypothesis and presented no differences between the RMS values of the Test group and the RMS values of the untreated control group. This work highlighted the usefulness of 3D superimposition procedure for purposes of human identification, in subjects undergoing dental treatment. However, keeping in sight the forensic use of this technique as a helpful probation element in court, further studies should be performed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalPalatal Expansion TechniqueAdolescentChildFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMouth MucosaPalate

Identifiers

PMID32060314
PMCPMC7021754
OpenAlexW3005681639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.