Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060150›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2020

Hemophilia therapy: the future has begun.

Pier Mannuccio Mannucci

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07736976 (Comparison of 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test Performance Between Individuals With Hemophilia and Healthy Peers), which is not on this map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07736976 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test Performance Between Individuals With Hemophilia and Healthy Peers: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBahçeşehir UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled58ConditionsHemophilia A and B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous prophylaxis with dalcinonacog alfa in adults with haemophilia B.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Epigenetic Landscape of Hemophilia.Current molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Haemophilia B: an illustrative review of current challenges and opportunities.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Burden of Haemophilia A in South Korea: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study From 2008 to 2021.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Article
  20. Haemophilia Prophylaxis in the Age of Innovation: Exploring Opportunities for Personalized Treatment.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Review

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pier Mannuccio MannucciFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, Italy piermannuccio.mannucci@policlinico.mi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success story of hemophilia care first began in the 1970s, when the availability of plasma-derived concentrates of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) provided efficacious treatment of bleeding in patients with hemophilia A and B. This positive scenario was consolidated in terms of greater safety and availability in the 1990s, when the first recombinant coagulation factors were produced. This meant that, instead of only treating episodic bleeding events, prophylaxis regimens could be implemented as a preventive measure. Following the demonstration of its superiority in the frame of two randomized clinical trials, prophylaxis became evidence-based standard of care. In high-income countries, these achievements have led to a patients' life expectancy being extended to close to that of the general male population. Alongside this, the last decade has witnessed further spectacular therapeutic progress, such as the availability of coagulation factors with a longer plasma half-life that allow for wider intervals between treatment. Moreover, new therapeutic products based on new mechanisms other than the replacement of the deficient factor, have become available (emicizumab) or are at an advanced stage of development. This review celebrates the success story of hemophilia care, while also discussing current limitations, issues and as yet unmet needs. The prospects of cure by means of gene therapy are also outlined.

Indexed as

Hemophilia ABlood Coagulation FactorsBlood Coagulation TestsFactor IXFactor VIIIGenetic TherapyHumansMaleBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor IXFactor VIII

Identifiers

PMID32060150
PMCPMC7049365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.