Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32060097›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2020

On the wrong DNA track: Molecular mechanisms of repeat-mediated genome instability.

Alexandra N Khristich, Sergei M Mirkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Disruption of RNA metabolism and its impact on protein homeostasis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanism of MutLβ-dependent DNA expansions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra N KhristichDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155.
Sergei M MirkinDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155. Electronic address: sergei.mirkin@tufts.edu.

Funding

NIGMS Equipment SupplementR35GM130322 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI SERGEI MIRKIN · 2019 to 2026
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expansions of simple tandem repeats are responsible for almost 50 human diseases, the majority of which are severe, degenerative, and not currently treatable or preventable. In this review, we first describe the molecular mechanisms of repeat-induced toxicity, which is the connecting link between repeat expansions and pathology. We then survey alternative DNA structures that are formed by expandable repeats and review the evidence that formation of these structures is at the core of repeat instability. Next, we describe the consequences of the presence of long structure-forming repeats at the molecular level: somatic and intergenerational instability, fragility, and repeat-induced mutagenesis. We discuss the reasons for gender bias in intergenerational repeat instability and the tissue specificity of somatic repeat instability. We also review the known pathways in which DNA replication, transcription, DNA repair, and chromatin state interact and thereby promote repeat instability. We then discuss possible reasons for the persistence of disease-causing DNA repeats in the genome. We describe evidence suggesting that these repeats are a payoff for the advantages of having abundant simple-sequence repeats for eukaryotic genome function and evolvability. Finally, we discuss two unresolved fundamental questions: (i) why does repeat behavior differ between model systems and human pedigrees, and (ii) can we use current knowledge on repeat instability mechanisms to cure repeat expansion diseases?

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationChromatinDNA RepairDNA Repeat ExpansionDNA ReplicationGenetic Diseases, InbornGenome, HumanGenomic InstabilityHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsChromatinamyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (Lou Gehrig disease)DNA recombinationDNA repairDNA replicationDNA structuregene expressiongenomic instabilityG-quadruplexhairpinHuntington diseaseR-loopS-DNAtrinucleotide repeat diseasetriplex H-DNA

Identifiers

PMID32060097
PMCPMC7105313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.