Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059718›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Improving medicines management for people with dementia in primary care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals to develop a theory-informed intervention.

Heather E Barry, Laura E Bedford, Máiréad McGrattan, Cristín Ryan, A Peter Passmore, A Louise Robinson, Gerard J Molloy, Carmel M Darcy, Hilary Buchanan, Carmel M Hughes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Carers' experiences and perspectives of the use of anticholinergic medications in people living with dementia: Analysis of an online discussion forum.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather E BarrySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Laura E BedfordSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Máiréad McGrattanSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Cristín RyanThe School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
A Peter PassmoreCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
A Louise RobinsonInstitute for Ageing and Institute for Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Gerard J MolloySchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Carmel M DarcyWestern Health & Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK.
Hilary Buchanan, Belfast, UK.
Carmel M HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK. c.hughes@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBNewcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IETrinity College Dublin · IEWestern Health and Social Care Trust · GB

Funding

HSC Research & Development Division and Atlantic Philanthropies COM/5020/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with dementia (PwD) face unique challenges with medicines management, yet little is known about these challenges from the perspectives of primary healthcare professionals, particularly general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists. Few medicines management interventions have been developed which are aimed at community-dwelling PwD. This study sought to develop an intervention to improve medicines management for PwD in primary care using a theory-informed approach.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs (n = 15) and community pharmacists (n = 15) to explore participants' views and experiences of medicines management for PwD, and their perceptions of barriers and facilitators to successful medicines management for PwD. The 14-domain Theoretical Domains Framework was the underpinning theoretical guide, allowing key theoretical domains to be identified and mapped to behaviour change techniques (BCTs) which are considered the 'active ingredients' of an intervention. Draft interventions were developed to operationalise selected BCTs and were presented to GPs and community pharmacists during task groups. Final selection of an intervention for feasibility testing was guided by feedback provided during these task groups and through application of the APEASE (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness/cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, Equity) criteria.

resultsParticipants expressed a number of concerns about medicines management for PwD, particularly monitoring adherence to medication regimens and conducting medication review. Two draft interventions comprising selected BCTs ('Modelling or demonstration of behaviour'; 'Salience of consequences'; 'Health consequences'; 'Social and environmental consequences'; 'Action planning'; Social support or encouragement', 'Self-monitoring of behaviour') were developed, each targeting GPs and community pharmacists. Following the task groups and discussions within the research team, the community pharmacy-based intervention was selected for future feasibility testing. The intervention will target community pharmacists to conduct a medication review (incorporating an adherence check) with a PwD, delivered as an online video demonstrating key behaviours. The video will include feedback emphasising positive outcomes of performing the behaviours. Action planning and a quick reference guide will be used as complementary intervention components.

conclusionsA community pharmacist-based intervention has been developed targeting medicines management for PwD in primary care using a systematic, theory-informed approach. Future work will determine the usability and acceptability of implementing this intervention in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AgedAttitude of Health PersonnelDementiaFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth Services ResearchHumansIndependent LivingMaleMedication Therapy ManagementPharmacistsPrimary Health CarePsychological TheoryQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementAPEASEBehaviour changeDementiaInterventionMedicines managementPrimary careQualitativeTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID32059718
PMCPMC7023803
OpenAlexW3009081915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.