Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059717›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2020

Membrane and synaptic defects leading to neurodegeneration in Adar mutant Drosophila are rescued by increased autophagy.

Anzer Khan, Simona Paro, Leeanne McGurk, Nagraj Sambrani, Marion C Hogg, James Brindle, Giuseppa Pennetta, Liam P Keegan, Mary A O'Connell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Attenuation of Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in aJournal of developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anzer KhanCEITEC Masaryk University, Kamenice 735/5, A35, CZ 62 500, Brno, Czech Republic.
Simona ParoMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine at the University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Leeanne McGurkMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine at the University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Nagraj SambraniCEITEC Masaryk University, Kamenice 735/5, A35, CZ 62 500, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marion C HoggMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine at the University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
James BrindleMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine at the University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Giuseppa PennettaCentre for Integrative Physiology, Euan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research, Hugh Robson Building, University of Edinburgh, George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK.
Liam P KeeganCEITEC Masaryk University, Kamenice 735/5, A35, CZ 62 500, Brno, Czech Republic. Liam.Keegan@ceitec.muni.cz.
Mary A O'ConnellCEITEC Masaryk University, Kamenice 735/5, A35, CZ 62 500, Brno, Czech Republic. mary.oconnell@ceitec.muni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3844-6174
Institute of Genetics and Cancer · GBCentral European Institute of Technology · CZCentral European Institute of Technology – Masaryk University · CZMasaryk University · CZUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council U.1275.01.005.00001.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn fly brains, the Drosophila Adar (adenosine deaminase acting on RNA) enzyme edits hundreds of transcripts to generate edited isoforms of encoded proteins. Nearly all editing events are absent or less efficient in larvae but increase at metamorphosis; the larger number and higher levels of editing suggest editing is most required when the brain is most complex. This idea is consistent with the fact that Adar mutations affect the adult brain most dramatically. However, it is unknown whether Drosophila Adar RNA editing events mediate some coherent physiological effect. To address this question, we performed a genetic screen for suppressors of Adar mutant defects. Adar

resultsA genetic screen revealed suppression of all Adar

conclusionsThese findings link Drosophila Adar mutant synaptic and neurotransmission defects to more general cellular defects in autophagy; presumably, edited isoforms of CNS proteins are required for optimum synaptic response capabilities in the brain during the behaviorally complex adult life stage.

Indexed as

AutophagyAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsLarvaMaleMutationSynaptic TransmissionAdar protein, DrosophilaAdenosine DeaminaseDrosophila ProteinsADARAutophagyDrosophilaNeurodegenerationRNA editingTOR

Identifiers

PMID32059717
PMCPMC7020516
OpenAlexW3009618299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.