Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059693›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Sustainable, healthy cities: protocol of a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster randomized controlled trial for Aedes control in Brazil using a community mobilization approach.

Kate Zinszer, Andrea Caprara, Antonio Lima, Stéphanie Degroote, Monica Zahreddine, Kellyanne Abreu, Mabel Carabali, Katia Charland, Mayana Azevedo Dantas, José Wellington and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Kate ZinszerSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. kate.zinszer@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-1145
Andrea CapraraQuébec Population Health Research Network, Montréal, Canada.
Antonio LimaFortaleza Municipal Health Secretariat, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Stéphanie DegrooteFrench Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Paris, France.
Monica ZahreddineSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Kellyanne AbreuQuébec Population Health Research Network, Montréal, Canada.
Mabel CarabaliMcGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Katia CharlandSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Mayana Azevedo DantasQuébec Population Health Research Network, Montréal, Canada.
José WellingtonQuébec Population Health Research Network, Montréal, Canada.
Beatriz ParraUniversitario del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Florence FournetFrench Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Paris, France.
Emmanuel BonnetFrench Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Paris, France.
Denis PérezSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Emilie RobertSHERPA Research Centre, Montréal, Canada.
Christian DagenaisSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Tarik BenmarhniaUniversity of California, San Diego, USA.
Neil AnderssonMcGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Valéry RiddeFrench Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Paris, France.
Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales · FRThe Quebec Population Health Research Network · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAComputer Research Institute of Montréal · CAInstituto de Medicina Tropical “Pedro Kourí” · CUMcGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero · MXUniversidade de Fortaleza · BRUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

CIHR 201803PJT-400444-RC2-CFCA-120159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue is increasing in its global presence with an estimated 4 billion people at-risk of infection in at least 128 countries. Despite the promising results of EcoHealth and community mobilization approaches to Aedes reduction, more evidence of their efficacy on reducing dengue risk is needed. The principal research question is to determine if interventions based upon community mobilization reduce the risk of dengue virus infection among children 3 to 9 years old compared to usual dengue control practice in Fortaleza, Brazil.

methodsThe present study will follow a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) design with randomization at the census tract level with equal allocation to the two arms. In each arm, there will be 34 clusters of 86 children between 3 to 9 years old for an expected total of 5848 children enrolled in the study, assuming a risk reduction of 29.5% based upon findings from a previous multi-site cRCT. The primary outcomes are rates of anti-dengue Immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion and adult female Aedes density. The intervention is based upon a participatory health research approach, Socializing Evidence for Participatory Action (SEPA), where the research evidence is used to foster community engagement and ownership of the health issue and solution. Following allocation, intervention communities will develop and implement their own solutions that will likely include a wide variety of collective events and media approaches. Data collection activities over a period of 3 years include household visits for blood collection, household surveys, and entomological surveys; and qualitative activities including focus groups, in-depth interviews, and document analysis to evaluate the process, acceptability, fidelity, and sustainability of the intervention. Study participants will be aware of their assignment and all research staff will be blinded although the intervention assignment will likely be revealed to field staff through interaction with participants. DISCUSSION: The results of our study will provide evidence on community mobilization as an intervention for dengue control. We anticipate that if community mobilization is effective in Fortaleza, the results of this study will help develop evidence-based vector control programs in Brazil, and also in other countries struggling with Aedes-transmitted diseases.

trial registrationISRCTN66131315, registration date: 1 October 2018.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAdultAedesAnimalsBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCitiesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchDengueFemaleHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAedes mosquitosBrazilCluster randomized controlled trialCommunity-based interventionCommunity empowermentDengueMixed methodsVector control

Identifiers

PMID32059693
PMCPMC7023806
OpenAlexW3005826469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.