Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059684›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial.

Lesley Sinclair, Margaret McFadden, Helen Tilbrook, Alex Mitchell, Ada Keding, Judith Watson, Linda Bauld, Frank Kee, David Torgerson, Catherine Hewitt and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Treatable Traits in Pregnant Women with Asthma.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lesley SinclairUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Margaret McFaddenClinical R&D, Dykebar Hospital, Grahamstone Road, Paisley, PA2 7DE, UK.
Helen TilbrookYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Alex MitchellYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Ada KedingYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Judith WatsonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Linda BauldUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
Frank KeeCentre of Excellence for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK.
David TorgersonYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Catherine HewittYork Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, Alcuin Research Resource Centre, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Jennifer McKellInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Pat HoddinottNMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Fiona M HarrisNMAHP Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Isabelle UnyInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
Kathleen BoydHealth Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Nicola McMeekinHealth Economics & Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, 1 Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8RZ, UK.
Michael UssherInstitute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
David M TappinScottish Cot Death Trust, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Glasgow University, 5th Floor, Glasgow, G3 8SJ, UK. david.tappin@glasgow.ac.uk.
CPIT III local research teams
University of York · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29792Cancer Research UK C48006/A20863Chief Scientist Office HIPS/16/01CSRD VA 1Department of Health 10/31/02Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. UK national guidelines highlight lack of evidence for effectiveness of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers quit. This includes a research recommendation: within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit?

methodsThe Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) III is a pragmatic, 42-month, multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial of the effect on smoking status of adding to usual Stop Smoking Services (SSS) support, the offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives, compared with usual support alone, to quit smoking during pregnancy. Participants (n = 940) are pregnant smokers (age > 16 years, < 24 weeks pregnant, English speaking), who consent via telephone to take part and are willing to be followed-up in late pregnancy and 6 months after birth. The primary outcome is cotinine/anabasine-validated abstinence from smoking in late pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include engagement with SSS, quit rates at 4 weeks from agreed quit date and 6 months after birth, and birth weight. Outcomes will be analysed by intention to treat, and regression models will be used to compare treatment effects on outcomes. A meta-analysis will include data from the feasibility study in Glasgow. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness from a UK NHS perspective. Process evaluation using a case-study approach will identify opportunities to improve recruitment and learning for future implementation. Research questions include: what is the therapeutic efficacy of incentives; are incentives cost-effective; and what are the potential facilitators and barriers to implementing incentives in different parts of the UK? DISCUSSION: This phase III trial in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland follows a successful phase II trial in Glasgow, UK. The participating sites have diverse SSS that represent most cessation services in the UK and serve demographically varied populations. If found to be acceptable and cost-effective, this trial could demonstrate that financial incentives are effective and transferable to most UK SSS for pregnant women.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15236311. Registered on 9 October 2017.

Indexed as

Financial SupportMotivationAdolescentAdultClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNorthern IrelandPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyPrenatal CareFinancial incentivesInterventionMaternal and child healthOutcomesPregnancyPreventionRandomised controlled trialSmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID32059684
PMCPMC7023794
OpenAlexW2998782976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.