ArticleBiomedical engineering online2020
Epileptic seizure classifications using empirical mode decomposition and its derivative.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectual seizure detection using MBBF-GPSO with CNN network.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of features and classification techniques in breast cancer detection for Biglycan biomarker images.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024Article
- A review of epilepsy detection and prediction methods based on EEG signal processing and deep learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Machine Learning: Taxonomy, Opportunities, and Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Graph-generative neural network for EEG-based epileptic seizure detection via discovery of dynamic brain functional connectivity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- DWT-EMD Feature Level Fusion Based Approach over Multi and Single Channel EEG Signals for Seizure Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- SASDL and RBATQ: Sparse Autoencoder With Swarm Based Deep Learning and Reinforcement Based Q-Learning for EEG Classification.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- A Recent Investigation on Detection and Classification of Epileptic Seizure Techniques Using EEG Signal.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Comparison of Empirical Mode Decomposition, Wavelets, and Different Machine Learning Approaches for Patient-Specific Seizure Detection Using Signal-Derived Empirical Dictionary Approach.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders associated with disruption of brain activity. In the classification and detection of epileptic seizures, electroencephalography (EEG) measurements, which record the electrical activities of the brain, are frequently used. Empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and its derivative, ensemble EMD (EEMD) are recently developed methods used to decompose non-stationary and nonlinear signals such as EEG into a finite number of oscillations called intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Our main objective in this study is to present a hybrid IMF selection method combining four different approaches (energy, correlation, power spectral distance, and statistical significance measures), and investigate the effect of selected IMFs extracted by EMD and EEMD on the classification. We have applied the proposed IMF selection approach on the classification of EEG signals recorded from epilepsy patients who are under treatment at our collaborator hospital. Multichannel EEG signals collected from epilepsy patients are decomposed into IMFs, and then IMF selection was performed. Finally, time- and spectral-domain, and nonlinear features are extracted and feature sets are created for the classification.
resultsThe maximum classification accuracies obtained using various combinations of IMFs were 94.56%, 95.63%, 96.8%, and 96.25% for SVM, KNN, naive Bayes, and logistic regression classifiers, respectively, by using EMD analysis; whereas, the EEMD approach has provided maximum classification accuracies of 96.06%, 97%, 97%, and 96.25% for SVM, KNN, naive Bayes, and logistic regression, respectively. Classification performance with the same features obtained using direct EEG signals instead of the decomposed IMFs was worse than the aforementioned 2 approaches for every combination.
conclusionSimulation results demonstrate that the proposed IMF selection approach affects the classification results. Also, EEMD provides a robust method for feature extraction from EEG signals in order to classify pre-seizure and seizure segments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.