Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059649›Full record

ReviewBMC geriatrics2020

Developing evidence-based guidance for assessment of suspected infections in care home residents.

Carmel Hughes, David R Ellard, Anne Campbell, Rachel Potter, Catherine Shaw, Evie Gardner, Ashley Agus, Dermot O'Reilly, Martin Underwood, Mark Loeb and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carmel HughesSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. c.hughes@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-6021
David R EllardWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Anne CampbellFaculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rachel PotterWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Catherine ShawSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Evie GardnerNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, The Royal Hospitals, Belfast, UK.
Ashley AgusNorthern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, The Royal Hospitals, Belfast, UK.
Dermot O'ReillyCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Mark LoebDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Bob StaffordOrchard Care Homes, Preston, UK.
Michael TunneySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/97/12National Institute for Health Research 13/97/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to update and refine an algorithm, originally developed in Canada, to assist care home staff to manage residents with suspected infection in the United Kingdom care home setting. The infections of interest were urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections and skin and soft tissue infection.

methodWe used a multi-faceted process involving a literature review, consensus meeting [nominal group technique involving general practitioners (GPs) and specialists in geriatric medicine and clinical microbiology], focus groups (care home staff and resident family members) and interviews (GPs), alongside continual iterative internal review and analysis within the research team.

resultsSix publications were identified in the literature which met inclusion criteria. These were used to update the algorithm which was presented to a consensus meeting (four participants all with a medical background) which discussed and agreed to inclusion of signs and symptoms, and the algorithm format. Focus groups and interview participants could see the value in the algorithm, and staff often reported that it reflected their usual practice. There were also interesting contrasts between evidence and usual practice informed by experience. Through continual iterative review and analysis, the final algorithm was finally presented in a format which described management of the three infections in terms of initial assessment of the resident, observation of the resident and action by the care home staff.

conclusionsThis study has resulted in an updated algorithm targeting key infections in care home residents which should be considered for implementation into everyday practice.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingEvidence-Based MedicineHomes for the AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicAgedHumansInfectionsNursing HomesRespiratory Tract InfectionsSkin Diseases, InfectiousSoft Tissue InfectionsUnited KingdomUrinary Tract InfectionsAlgorithmCare homesInfectionsOlder peoplePrescribing

Identifiers

PMID32059649
PMCPMC7023778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.