ReviewBiosensors2020
Label-Free Biosensors for Laboratory-Based Diagnostics of Infections: Current Achievements and New Trends.
Review in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smart label-free SPR biosensing platform for hemoglobin and urine glucose detection via machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Label-Free Electrochemical Biosensors: An Updated Perspective Focused on Genosensing, Multiplexing, and Commercial Potential.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances in Impedimetric Biosensors: Current Applications and Future Directions.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Biosensor: An Emerging Technological Tool for Microorganisms and Its Disease Diagnosis.Indian journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Technology for Detecting Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers.Cancers · 2023Review
- Optimizing an Optical Cavity-Based Biosensor for Enhanced Sensitivity.IEEE sensors journal · 2023Article
- Ultrasensitive tapered optical fiber refractive index glucose sensor.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Modern Electrochemical Biosensing Based on Nucleic Acids and Carbon Nanomaterials.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bioadhesive Gauze Embedded with Chitosan-Butein Bioconjugate: A Redox-Active pH Sensor Platform.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Utilizing Electrochemical-Based Sensing Approaches for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples: A Review.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Harmful Microalgae Detection: Biosensors versus Some Conventional Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Recent advances in the potential applications of luminescence-based, SPR-based, and carbon-based biosensors.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Acoustic Biosensors and Microfluidic Devices in the Decennium: Principles and Applications.Micromachines · 2021Review
- PfHRP2 detection using plasmonic optrodes: performance analysis.Malaria journal · 2021Article
- Host-Pathogen Adhesion as the Basis of Innovative Diagnostics for Emerging Pathogens.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Recent Advancements in Aptamer-Based Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing Strategies.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Label-Free Manner Using Micromechanical Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Photocatalytic Behaviour of Zinc Oxide Nanostructures on Surface Activation of Polymeric Fibres.Polymers · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infections pose a serious global public health problem and are a major cause of premature mortality worldwide. One of the most challenging objectives faced by modern medicine is timely and accurate laboratory-based diagnostics of infectious diseases. Being a key factor of timely initiation and success of treatment, it may potentially provide reduction in incidence of a disease, as well as prevent outbreak and spread of dangerous epidemics. The traditional methods of laboratory-based diagnostics of infectious diseases are quite time- and labor-consuming, require expensive equipment and qualified personnel, which restricts their use in case of limited resources. Over the past six decades, diagnostic technologies based on lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) have been and remain true alternatives to modern laboratory analyzers and have been successfully used to quickly detect molecular ligands in biosubstrates to diagnose many infectious diseases and septic conditions. These devices are considered as simplified formats of modern biosensors. Recent advances in the development of label-free biosensor technologies have made them promising diagnostic tools that combine rapid pathogen indication, simplicity, user-friendliness, operational efficiency, accuracy, and cost effectiveness, with a trend towards creation of portable platforms. These qualities exceed the generally accepted standards of microbiological and immunological diagnostics and open up a broad range of applications of these analytical systems in clinical practice immediately at the site of medical care (point-of-care concept, POC). A great variety of modern nanoarchitectonics of biosensors are based on the use of a broad range of analytical and constructive strategies and identification of various regulatory and functional molecular markers associated with infectious bacterial pathogens. Resolution of the existing biosensing issues will provide rapid development of diagnostic biotechnologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.