Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32059538›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2020

Label-Free Biosensors for Laboratory-Based Diagnostics of Infections: Current Achievements and New Trends.

Boris G Andryukov, Natalya N Besednova, Roman V Romashko, Tatyana S Zaporozhets, Timofey A Efimov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boris G AndryukovSomov Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, 690087 Vladivostok, Russia.
Natalya N BesednovaSomov Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, 690087 Vladivostok, Russia.
Roman V RomashkoInstitute of Automation and Control Processes (IAPU) of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.
Tatyana S ZaporozhetsSomov Research Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, 690087 Vladivostok, Russia.
Timofey A EfimovInstitute of Automation and Control Processes (IAPU) of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia.
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology · RUInstitute of Automation and Control Processes · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections pose a serious global public health problem and are a major cause of premature mortality worldwide. One of the most challenging objectives faced by modern medicine is timely and accurate laboratory-based diagnostics of infectious diseases. Being a key factor of timely initiation and success of treatment, it may potentially provide reduction in incidence of a disease, as well as prevent outbreak and spread of dangerous epidemics. The traditional methods of laboratory-based diagnostics of infectious diseases are quite time- and labor-consuming, require expensive equipment and qualified personnel, which restricts their use in case of limited resources. Over the past six decades, diagnostic technologies based on lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) have been and remain true alternatives to modern laboratory analyzers and have been successfully used to quickly detect molecular ligands in biosubstrates to diagnose many infectious diseases and septic conditions. These devices are considered as simplified formats of modern biosensors. Recent advances in the development of label-free biosensor technologies have made them promising diagnostic tools that combine rapid pathogen indication, simplicity, user-friendliness, operational efficiency, accuracy, and cost effectiveness, with a trend towards creation of portable platforms. These qualities exceed the generally accepted standards of microbiological and immunological diagnostics and open up a broad range of applications of these analytical systems in clinical practice immediately at the site of medical care (point-of-care concept, POC). A great variety of modern nanoarchitectonics of biosensors are based on the use of a broad range of analytical and constructive strategies and identification of various regulatory and functional molecular markers associated with infectious bacterial pathogens. Resolution of the existing biosensing issues will provide rapid development of diagnostic biotechnologies.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCommunicable DiseasesHumansMicrofluidic Analytical Techniquesbiosensorsinfectious diseaseslabel-free biosensorslaboratory-based diagnosticsmolecular markerssensory strategies

Identifiers

PMID32059538
PMCPMC7169461
OpenAlexW3006217146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.